Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Chapter 10/Example 7: CS Statement of Changes in Equity
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- October 10, 2017 at 6:20 pm #410252
Dear Mike,
I am experiencing pressure with Ex7 in Ch10, particularly, with CS Statement of Changes in Equity: where does £33500 deduction in Retained Earnings come from?(1)Secondly, when we do W3b/f why do we use RE per question as RE per question minus Retained Earnings for the year?(2)
Why do we not take any share of £49000 RE in Liga, but show it as a gain of the group instead?(3)
We don’t deduct any NCI in CS SOFP but we only show it in Statement of Changes in equity, why so? (4)With all the workings 3 and 4 how to determine when to use the format of b/f and c/f instead of ordinary straightforward calculation (per q – less pre acq -our share – total re)
I seem to be unfamiliar with the layout demonstrated in this example, can you assist me with recommending a relevant lecture video?Also, the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position: why do we have to show receivable in the group and subsequently tax it if on the next day the group, as such, doesn’t exist?
I am sorry for loading you with petty queries, hope you could help to get me back on the track,
Kind Regards,
TanyaOctober 11, 2017 at 7:59 am #410300Statements of changes in equity are not in the F7 syllabus
The example is there because I haven’t done a separate recording / chapter for statements of changes in equity and yet you DO need them for questions on preparation of single entity financial statements
(1) “Where does $33,500 deduction come from? It’s the loss for the year and it’s shown as the final figure in the Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss IMMEDIATELY above the heading Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
(2) “when we do W3b/f why do we use RE per question as RE per question minus Retained Earnings for the year?”
Because the retained earnings as at the end of the year is the aggregation of retained earnings brought forward as adjusted (increased or decreased as appropriate) for retained earnings this year. So, if I know retained earnings at the end of the year and I know retained earnings for the year, then I can calculate retained earnings brought forward
(3) “Why do we not take any share of £49000 RE in Liga, but show it as a gain of the group instead?”
Because, at the end of the year, Liga is no longer a subsidiary
(4) “We don’t deduct any NCI in CS SOFP but we only show it in Statement of Changes in equity, why so?”
Because, at the end of the year there is no subsidiary and therefore no non-controlling interest
“Also, the Consolidated Statement of Financial Position: why do we have to show receivable in the group and subsequently tax it if on the next day the group, as such, doesn’t exist?”
The question tells us that “The disposal has not yet been reflected in Diana’s financial statements” so the $400,000 sale proceeds has not yet been recorded and must therefore still be a receivable as at the year end
We’re not taxing the receivable. We’re taxing the gain on the sale by Diana of her investment in the Liga subsidiary
“… if on the next day the group, as such, doesn’t exist?”
Are you asking here whether it’s correct that Diana should be taxed on the gain made on the sale when in fact Diana no longer holds those shares? Are you really asking that?
Try to understand the logic behind the “b/f'”s and “c/f”s in the statement of changes in equity – much better to understand what’s happening and why rather than simply try to memorise “standard” procedures … because the examiner doesn’t always ask questions that fit into “standard” format!
“I am sorry for loading you with petty queries, hope you could help to get me back on the track”
Don’t worry about asking questions – that’s why Opentuition was set up – to help students like you to sort out issues before they get into the exam room
Hopefully I’ve managed to get you back on track
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Chapter 10/Example 7: CS Statement of Changes in Equity’ is closed to new replies.