Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Chmura co(dec '13)
- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- September 5, 2017 at 2:46 pm #405649
Hi John
The question said that the realizable values were inclusive of tax impact, but the Rv for land and building wasn’t calculated based on an after tax basis.
When it is not stated that residual values are after tax, do we assume that?September 5, 2017 at 3:45 pm #405673It is says it is inclusive of the tax impact then it means the tax impact has been taken into account in the values. So it is saying the the residual values are after tax.
(Had they written that it excluded the tax impact, then the residual values would be before tax and you would then need to account for the tax.)
September 5, 2017 at 5:17 pm #405713But then if tax impact have been taken into consideration, why still do a balancing allowance computation for machinery?
September 6, 2017 at 9:26 am #405920The ‘inclusive of tax impact’ in the question is referring to the land and buildings.
The balancing allowance is for the machines and the question specifically says that a balancing adjustment will be required in respect of the machinery !!
September 6, 2017 at 6:33 pm #406175Ok thank you
September 7, 2017 at 7:16 am #406282You are welcome 🙂
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Chmura co(dec '13)’ is closed to new replies.