Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Kilenc company June 2012
- This topic has 5 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- August 17, 2017 at 7:12 pm #402252
Hi John,
In b why Apv isn’t appropriate for kilenc? If it wants to set up a subsidiary company in lanosia, it’s capital structure will definitely change so Apv would be better. Isn’t it?August 17, 2017 at 8:02 pm #402278I am away at the moment and so do not have access to the question. My flight does not get me home until after midnight.
So please ask again tomorrow and then I will answer you.
August 19, 2017 at 11:13 am #402450Hi John,
In b why Apv isn’t appropriate for kilenc? If it wants to set up a subsidiary company in lanosia, it’s capital structure will definitely change so Apv would be better. Isn’t it?August 19, 2017 at 3:13 pm #402483But who is saying that it is not appropriate?
Part (b) asks about dark pool trading and has nothing to do with how the proposal may be assessed.
August 19, 2017 at 4:00 pm #402490I’m using kaplan kit and it says that Apv isn’t appropriate. Please explain me the reasonable answer to write in the exam.
And do you have lectures about warrants?August 20, 2017 at 6:02 am #402544I am sorry but I do not have the Kaplan Kit and so I can’t comment on what they have written – they have obviously added something to the original question.
I explain what warrants are in the F9 lectures, but there is no specific lecture on them – there is no need for one.
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Kilenc company June 2012’ is closed to new replies.