Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › legislation
- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by
MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- August 1, 2017 at 10:41 am #399796
Hi Mike.
I sat an ACCA practice paper. When I looked at the answers, it made the following claims about legislation:
firstly:
1. an act does not immediately come into operation after it receives Royal Assent.
may I ask you, why is that?
2. that “the electoral system means that the statute-making process responds to public opinion”
it claims that the above statement is true. that cannot possibly be true in a practical sense or even theoretical sense. how can they seriously give something like that a mark? i could understand if they said something like “is intended to”.
thank you for your response in advance.
August 1, 2017 at 10:55 am #399801“1. an act does not immediately come into operation after it receives Royal Assent.
may I ask you why it wouldn’t?”
Built into the acts are dates and time limits – sufficient to enable those interested to sort out their affairs before their current activities become, say, non-profitable or even illegal
So different parts of new legislation come into force over a period of time
“2. that “the electoral system means that the statute-making process responds to public opinion””
I’m not sure that I fully understand that point. I’m struggling with the use of the expression “statute-making process”
I can agree that the passing of new statute is responding to some extent on public opinion – I was reading today on the BBC website that it’s 50 years since the repeal of the Sexual Offences Act that made it an offence for two adult males to have sexual relations
That surely is an example of Parliament passing legislation in response to public opinion
But I wouldn’t have quoted that as an example of “the statute-making process”
Maybe the point is that statute is passed by Parliament’s two houses, one of which is an elected body and thus those members of parliament both individually and collectively have to respond to the wishes of their electorate
That’s what appears to be causing some reluctance on the part of Parliament to sort out the machinery necessary to arrive at a smooth exit from the European Union
For those of you that voted for Brexit, can you show me a single new hospital that has been built (one per week) by the funding from Britain’s exit – what happened to those 350 million GBP that we were going to save each week?
But the members of the House of Commons are duty bound to follow the wishes of their electors
Is that what that quote means? I wonder
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘legislation’ is closed to new replies.