Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA LW Corporate and Business Law Forums › courts
- This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by iloveaccountancy.
- AuthorPosts
- July 20, 2017 at 4:46 pm #397821
Hi sir..
“The supreme court binds all lower courts but does not bind itself”.
Could you please explain me what does that mean?
Thanks!July 21, 2017 at 7:39 pm #397993If you want a question answered by the tutor you should ask in the ask the tutor forum.This forum is primarily designed for students to help one another.When it says the supreme court binds other lower courts it means lower courts must follow the legal precedents set by the supreme court where applicable to a relevant case.These points of law that have been decided must be followed by all courts below the supreme court.However,the supreme court is not bound by its own previous precedent.In other words it can change its mind on a point of law.
August 3, 2017 at 10:08 am #400194Hi Amirs
I think it means that:
The supreme court does not have to act according to its own precedents (the decisions of previous cases in the supreme court). However these previous cases do have influence on the lower courts.
Best to double check with Mike on the “ask the tutor” forum for F4.
August 3, 2017 at 10:09 am #400195I think you mistook this for the ask the tutor forum. here is the link:
https://opentuition.com/forum/ask-acca-tutor-forums/ask-the-tutor-acca-f4-exams/
August 3, 2017 at 10:10 am #400196Jon I was just putting it in simpler wording.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.