- This topic has 89 replies, 34 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
.
- Posts
How did you find it guys, I regret choosing question 2, I found it challenging especially the principle based part…
@taftan said:
How did you find it guys, I regret choosing question 2, I found it challenging especially the principle based part…I choose question 2, and now i regret for choosing this question 🙁 so sad, but i think question 4 is also difficult.
So damn true about choosing question 2 without reading fully as I was running short of time and thought principles based governance question should be straight forward. With 20 mins left I started this question and found myself feeling miserable in the end when I realised that I had interpreted the question wrongly and wrote a stupid answer for the heck if it. I could have easily chosen q4 . Such a bad decision today. 25 marks at stake. :(((
@anhbao0123 said:
I choose question 2, and now i regret for choosing this question 🙁 so sad, but i think question 4 is also difficult.Nooo!! Question4 was actually straight forward imo. I remember it vaguely ..it was about risk management internal control deficiencies and risk assessment. Easy questions but time consuming as it required elaboration which is y i chose 2 as I had less than half hour to go. Ques 2 turned out to be very twisted and difficult 🙁
I also chose question 2, do you remember exactly what was it asking?
Principles-Based approach and disadvantages if want to try internationlly, right?
Principles-based approach, disclosures and diversification was another one.
ICGN’s guidance for institutional investors was the last one i think?
@tayyabom said:
I also chose question 2, do you remember exactly what was it asking?Principles-Based approach and disadvantages if want to try internally, right?
Principles-based approach, disclosures and diversification was another one.
ICGN’s guidance for institutional investors was the last one i think?
Yeah. It was basically the advantages of principles based gov for the fund manager and how voluntary disclosures will help her. Part b was how diversification will help reduce financial risk.
Part c was about the reasons to adopt a principles based framework or the features (dont remember well) and d was limitations of that.I remember writing the generic points only and at hindsight I think I’m entirely wrong . :(((((
2a Describe elements of principles based and why Julia would benefit from volutary disclosures when finding investments – 12 Marks
2b Ways of diversifying risk in Julias investments – 4 Marks
2ci Why companies like AAM Investment funds should follow principles of harmonisation of global governance standards written by ICGN – 5 Marks
2cii Limitations of Principles based rules for Julia & AAM – 4 Marks
Question 4 was difficult i regret to choose it, I have done the 100% paper question 1 takes too much time and i think i write it good but q2 and q4 I don’t know what examiner required and what did I write?
Do any one what the topic about? I find it hard to understand the question and what they looking for. It seen like this paper on a very niche side this time round
I wrote something like this about disclosures that since principles-based doesn’t have any fixed guidelines or rules therefore competitors are disclosing more information due to the fear that if their competitor is doing they have to do as well and then resembling it to Kohlberg’s peer pressure in conventional behavior. If your competitor is revealing more information about CSR and stuff then you have to do that as well hence more disclosures. there was no harm in contrasting this information with rules-based approach where there is fixed guidelines which makes it consistent and fixed closures for everyone, that was gist of my answer on disclosures.
Diversification to avoid financial risk, you can diversify easily to avoid these 2 things:
1) Liquidity risk – in case there is credit crunch in your economy even if not today it can be tomorrow so diversification covers that risk
2) Currency risk – in country you are operating may deteriorate its currency and therefore diversification is a good idea to cover this aspect of financial risk.
For the benefit of others writing in future :
Q1 – a public service organization which provided health care services to people for free out of government funding. The taxpayers wanted the govt to tighten the budgets on freebies and the govt had reduced the funding. So the healthcare authority has started charging people for secondary healthcare services (hearing aid) while primary care was still free.
An old lady who was hearing impaired and not provided with the hearing aid suffered injuries in a fire accident as she couldn’t hear the fire alarm. So get daughter took up the matter and wanted the org to provide freebies cos it was the elderly people’s absolute right to get them . But the authority refused to do it cos of the budget constraints. Second part was about reporting by the authority to the govt abt performance etc..
The org was very particular about regular reporting cos non compliance wud entail penalties.A- stakeholder’s conflicting needs (tax payers vs patients )
B- plotting 3 other stakeholders in mendelow matrix
C- criticise absolutism theory of the daughterD- a letter by mgmt of healthcare org to stakeholders on
Characteristics of info in the reporting , justification for reducing the freebies and sticking to the budget and how performance can be enhanced using 3E model. (D part had 22 marks )Ques 3 – csr strategy vs strategic csr
Identifying the position in gray Owen Adams matrix .Features of social and environmental audit and why it wud improve the assurance given by integrated reporting.
There was also another part here..I can’t remember that properly.@tayyabom said:
I wrote something like this about disclosures that since principles-based doesn’t have any fixed guidelines or rules therefore competitors are disclosing more information due to the fear that if their competitor is doing they have to do as well and then resembling it to Kohlberg’s peer pressure in conventional behavior. If your competitor is revealing more information about CSR and stuff then you have to do that as well hence more disclosures. there was no harm in contrasting this information with rules-based approach where there is fixed guidelines which makes it consistent and fixed closures for everyone, that was gist of my answer on disclosures.Diversification to avoid financial risk, you can diversify easily to avoid these 2 things:
1) Liquidity risk – in case there is credit crunch in your economy even if not today it can be tomorrow so diversification covers that risk
2) Currency risk – in country you are operating may deteriorate its currency and therefore diversification is a good idea to cover this aspect of financial risk.
I thought you were meant to write about the type of investments to choose when trying to avoid financial risk.
I.e. negatively correlated investments so that if one goes down, the other one goes up and offsets the financial loss/risk?
Or doing stuff like backward/forward/horizontal integration?
@aminb001 said:
I thought you were meant to write about the type of investments to choose when trying to avoid financial risk.I.e. negatively correlated investments so that if one goes down, the other one goes up and offsets the financial loss/risk?
Or doing stuff like backward/forward/horizontal integration?
So whatever these marks were gone for me 🙁 what about my approach on disclosures, seems right?
@kireeti said:
Mendelow matrix for all three.Anyone?Also, what happen if you put wrong roll no on additional Paper?
Doctor – high interest low power
The funding agency – high interest and high power
The health authority – high interest low power ( I wrote this cos question first said doctors were concerned abt it but couldn’t do much abt it and ‘similarly the authority was also forced to reduce budget’ or something like that..) I mentioned that explicitly which is y i took them with low power. I also said if they could demonstrate higher power they will be key players like the funding agency.
@tayyabom said:
So whatever these marks were gone for me 🙁 what about my approach on disclosures, seems right?Even I wrote something dramatically different like how flexible they are and how it can save time and efforts and encourage more disclosures which is why selecting investments is better etc etc.. Rofl.. 25 marks gone 😀
@nidsy said:
Doctor – high interest low powerThe funding agency – high interest and high power
The health authority – high interest low power ( I wrote this cos question first said doctors were concerned abt it but couldn’t do much abt it and ‘similarly the authority was also forced to reduce budget’ or something like that..) I mentioned that explicitly which is y i took them with low power. I also said if they could demonstrate higher power they will be key players like the funding agency.
there were three stake holders:
1) RICE – High Power – Low Interest
2) Oldshires – Low Power – High Interest
3) Doctors – Low Power – High InterestThat’s what I wrote. RICE low interest because there is no hint that they opposed this reduction. If they were pro-health care then why they didn’t take any action? that was my opinion anyway.
@tayyabom said:
what were the disadvantages of principles-based approach?Can be diluted easily and made to look like simple box ticking and unless ethical culture exists it can be circumvented easily as the emphasis is more on complying voluntarily unlike rules based which is penalty driven.
Toughest question i’ve ever seen in P1(Today) trust me,it was disaster and requirements were so so confusing.
Disadvantages of principles are basically the advantages of rules:
I.e. – no standardisation
– reduced confidence in compliance as they have a choice due to comply and explain
– difficult to interpret levels of governance whereas its easier to in rules based due to its exacting nature etc etc@tayyabom said:
there were three stake holders:1) RICE – High Power – Low Interest
2) Oldshires – Low Power – High Interest
3) Doctors – Low Power – High InterestThat’s what I wrote. RICE low interest because there is no hint that they opposed this reduction. If they were pro-health care then why they didn’t take any action? that was my opinion anyway.
You can interpret it has that RICE did have high interest because they said even though you have lower budget, you have to maintain primary health care
@tayyabom said:
there were three stake holders:1) RICE – High Power – Low Interest
2) Oldshires – Low Power – High Interest
3) Doctors – Low Power – High InterestThat’s what I wrote. RICE low interest because there is no hint that they opposed this reduction. If they were pro-health care then why they didn’t take any action? that was my opinion anyway.
Rice has high interest as they are directly involved in the issue right ? It is through them that the funds get disbursed and they are definitely interested as they will be impacted which is why they even want the reporting done. I maybe wrong..dunno. But I feel there’s no specific right or wrong answer for this part of the question as there aren’t enough facts.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.