• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

impairment of assets

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › impairment of assets

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 10, 2017 at 6:31 pm #385642
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Hi Mike!

    I actually have some issues with impairment of assets. Could you explain what does the following sentence means:

    “If the impairment loss relates to an asset that has previously been revalued upwards, it is first offset against any remaining revaluation surplus.”

    Thanks.

    May 10, 2017 at 7:47 pm #385649
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23329
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Asset carrying value $700,000, remaining useful life 10 years

    Revalued to $1,000,000, written off over 10 years

    2 years later, impaired down to $750,000, so a $50,000 impairment (($1,000,000 – 2 x $100,000) – $750,000)

    Are you going to debit Statement of Profit or Loss with $50,000

    No!

    You’ll debit that $50,000 impairment to Revaluation Reserve and leave $250,000 in that reserve

    We could have been doing an annual transfer from Revaluation Reserve, through Statement of Changes in Equity, to Retained Earnings of $60,000 (2 x $30,000) so Revaluation Reserve could now be only $240,000

    With the impairment, this will reduce further to $190,000

    What the extract is saying is that, where we have an impairment of an asset that has previously been revalued upwards, the impairment is first set against the revaluation reserve in so far as that reserve has not been written off

    Is that better?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • The topic ‘impairment of assets’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • ZaidRaza on IAS 16 Accounting for a revaluation – CIMA F1 Financial Reporting
  • mrjonbain on Chapter 11 Capital Gains Tax – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • james33 on Chapter 11 Capital Gains Tax – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • John Moffat on Group Accounts The Consolidated Income Statement (part b) – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 2 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in