• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

March 2026 ACCA Exams Results

Comments & Instant poll

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Plastik Consolidated P&L question from 2014

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › Plastik Consolidated P&L question from 2014

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by Avatarfashola94.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • January 18, 2017 at 6:02 pm #368217
    Avatarriverstixx
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Hi Mike

    I’ve been pulling my hair out on this question all day. Just when you think you’ve cracked it another question gives you grief!

    I find the Kaplin layout for showing Net assets of the Sub helps me, until I came across this question. It involves three columns At Acqu, At the Reporting Date and Post acqu.
    So I happily started to fill out my table as follows…

    At Acq – 9000 (Shares) , 2,000 (Retained earnings), Revaluation 4,000, Total 15,000

    At Reporting – 9,000 (shares), 3,500 (Ret earning), Revaluation 4,000, Depn (100), Revaluation post acqu 600, Total 8,000

    Post Acqu – 1,500 (ret earn), depn (100), post acqu revaluation 600, Total 2,000

    Everything works until I get to work out the parent Ret earn

    Parents own 6,300
    P’s share 1,600 (80% of 2,000 post in table above)
    Less PUP (120)
    Less unwind (135)
    Less imp gw (400) (80% of 500 impairment)

    This is 7,245?? 480 out to the answer which is the (80% of the 600 revaluation). Can’t find anything in my Kaplin text on this. Why is this adjustment needed in parents ret earnings for the revaluation of 600 to get the right answer? Have I set up the Net assets table incorrectly?

    Thanks

    February 9, 2017 at 3:31 pm #371771
    Avatarfashola94
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Please having issues for the retained earnings.
    Dont know why they subtracted the 1500 from the 3500…
    Getting me confused.

    February 9, 2017 at 6:50 pm #371797
    Avatarriverstixx
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 10
    • ☆

    Hi Fashola

    Not sure but I think Mike would want you to open a new subject thread for this? However, I can help you with this as I’ve been alerted to your email.

    $3,500 is for the period from 1 Oct 2013 – 30 Sept 2014 (reporting date) i.e the whole year!

    But we have only had our Subtrak business since 1 Jan 2014. That means that from 1 Oct to the 31 Dec, we have no right to our percentage of their retained earnings, but after this we do! How much did they earn in that period? Well lets look at the P&L!!

    For the whole year Subtrak made $2,000. The question says treat income and expenditure evenly through out the year. So lets do that!!

    1 Jan to 30 Sept is 9 months… $2,000 x 9/12 = 1,500 (post acquisition profit!)

    If they are subtracting 1,500 from the 3,500 they are therefore working out the pre acquisition retained earnings (the part we can’t take) which is required for the goodwill calculation.

    I find it helpful to draw a timeline diagram when working these out. Just helps me to visualize when everything took place.

    Hope this helps. If not, I’m sure Mike will reply on a new thread.

    Regards

    River

    February 10, 2017 at 1:32 pm #371855
    Avatarfashola94
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 16
    • ☆

    Hi Rivers,

    Thank you so much for your explanation.
    You talked about drawing the timeline, it will help.
    I get that now.
    God bless you.
    I appreciate.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Gyette on The Finance Function in the Digital Age – CIMA E1
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • mrjonbain on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • AllisonHoang on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data
  • zuluthanda1@gmail.com on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2026 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in

Cookies
We serve cookies. If you think that's ok, just click "Accept all". You can also choose what kind of cookies you want by clicking "Settings". Read our cookie policy
Settings Accept all
Cookies
Choose what kind of cookies to accept. Your choice will be saved for one year. Read our cookie policy
  • Necessary
    These cookies are not optional. They are needed for the website to function.
  • Statistics
    In order for us to improve the website's functionality and structure, based on how the website is used.
  • Experience
    In order for our website to perform as well as possible during your visit. If you refuse these cookies, some functionality will disappear from the website.
  • Marketing
    By sharing your interests and behavior as you visit our site, you increase the chance of seeing personalized content and offers.
Save Accept all