• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

limiting factors

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › limiting factors

  • This topic has 8 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 23, 2016 at 10:46 am #364308
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Dear sir,

    In your lectures, it has been shown that point B is the optimum.
    Will there be cases where the contribution line will not be in one corner of the feasible area; I mean that should the contribution line always touch one corner of the feasible area or it can be anywhere else within the feasible area?

    Thanks.

    December 23, 2016 at 10:21 pm #364358
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54705
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It has to be one of the corners because the contribution line has to be as far away from the origin as possible order to achieve maximum contribution.

    December 25, 2016 at 8:12 am #364425
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Dear sir,
    I do have watched your lectures for limiting factors; but I still have some doubt.
    In example 2, could you explain why slack for materials and labour is 0

    Thanks.

    December 25, 2016 at 2:42 pm #364437
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54705
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Because the optimum point lies on both the material and labour lines. Therefore all the material and labour is being used, and therefore there is no spare/slack.

    December 26, 2016 at 4:52 am #364450
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    I’ve got your point. Thanks a lot

    December 26, 2016 at 7:39 am #364451
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    concerning example 3,

    1.you have said that it would not be worth increasing the demand of E by one more unit. Could you briefly re explain why so?

    2. The shadow price is $1.125. In wordings could you briefly explain what does this represent?

    Thanks.

    December 26, 2016 at 1:00 pm #364478
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54705
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1. Because you are not able to sell the current full demand, so it is of no benefit to have higher demand.

    As I explain in the lecture, the shadow price is the most extra you would be prepared to pay in order to get one extra unit of the limited resource.

    January 4, 2017 at 3:55 pm #365067
    adarsh1997
    Participant
    • Topics: 646
    • Replies: 282
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Q manufactures 2 product:
    -A
    Selling price selling price $20.00
    Direct material($2.00 per kg) $6.00
    Direct labour $4.00
    Variable overhead $2.00

    -B
    Selling price $18.00
    Direct material($2.00 per kg) $5.00
    Direct labour $3.00
    Variable overhead $1.50

    Maximum demand for A is 500 units per week and for B is unlimited.

    What would be the shadow price of these materials be if materials were limited to 2,000 kg per week?

    The answer is $3.40 per kg

    -How to obtain the answer?
    (The workings are being shown in the book but with no explanation)

    January 4, 2017 at 4:55 pm #365086
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54705
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The contribution per unit for A is $8 and for B is $8.50.

    Each unit of A uses 3 kg of material and each unit of B uses 2.5 kg of material.

    Therefore the contribution per kg from A is 8/3 = $2.67, and from B is $3.40.

    Therefore they should produce as many B’s as they can from the limited material available (since the demand is unlimited).

    If they are able to buy more of the material, then because they would use it to make more B’s, they would be prepared to pay up to $3.40 a kg extra to get it. Therefore the shadow price is $3.40 per kg..

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Krishadarwin on Strategy : real life examples – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mabdullah31 on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • MikeLittle on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • roksy on Illegalities – ACCA Corporate and Business Law (LW) (ENG)
  • Fola94 on Presentation of financial statements – introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in