• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

receivable

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › receivable

  • This topic has 9 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • June 4, 2016 at 10:51 am #319292
    jingdong
    Participant
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 115
    • ☆☆☆

    Dear Sir, I am confusing about new policy about offering discount for earlier payment, in chapter 5 example 1 , I had learnt how they work, but in another question I found out another way to do it, let me show this another way:
    current receivable: 12,000,000 x 3/12=3,000,000
    offering 4% discount early payment: 12,000,000 x4%=480,000
    new receivable:(12,000,000-480,000) x 1/12=960,000
    fall in receivable: 3,000,000-960,000=2,040,000
    would you please tell me what reason for doing this in different way? this way which I found out is practice question 4 Ruby plc.
    many thanks

    June 4, 2016 at 4:09 pm #319356
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    If you watch the free lectures, I go through that way in a later example and explain when to use which way.
    (I hope that you are not using the lecture notes on their own – they go with the lectures and it is in the lectures that I explain and expand on the notes.)

    June 4, 2016 at 11:09 pm #319464
    jingdong
    Participant
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 115
    • ☆☆☆

    do you mean it is in the chapter 5 lecture?
    many thanks

    June 5, 2016 at 8:48 am #319528
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes – the lecture works through several examples (those in the free lecture notes).

    June 6, 2016 at 4:15 pm #319885
    jingdong
    Participant
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 115
    • ☆☆☆

    Dear Moffat, I have just watch your lecture, the example which you mentioned are not the case the same as practice question 4 Ruby plc, in this question the new policy receivable level calculated by this way: (4,000,000-26,667)x(26/365) instead of 4,000,000×14/365 which I had learnt in chapter 5 lecture. would you please tell me the basic theory about this different method?
    many thanks

    June 6, 2016 at 4:56 pm #319912
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It is not a different method at all !

    You have used 14/365 because the currently sell on 40 days credit and 40 – 26 = 14 days.

    However, just because they sell on 40 days credit does not mean that they all pay within 40 days. You know what the current receivables are from the Statement of financial position and so you look at the difference between the current receivables and the new receivables (as I do in the lecture).

    The examiner always put little tricks in questions (different ones each time), deliberately to make sure that you understand the topic and are not simply learning rules.

    The subtracting of 26,667 is the discount, but as I actually say in the lecture, there are arguments both for subtracting and for not subtracting the discount and the examiner allows it either way (even though the answer is slightly different).

    Incidentally, I do hope you have a Revision Kit from one of the approved publishers. Juts practicing the few questions at the back of the lecture notes is nothing like enough practice.

    June 6, 2016 at 6:15 pm #319966
    jingdong
    Participant
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 115
    • ☆☆☆

    thank you for your help patiently, but what i am still confused is that payment within14 days is new policy, not 26 days, would use 14 days for calculating new receivable , i still didn’t get across?

    June 6, 2016 at 7:09 pm #320011
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The question says that the new policy will result in the average period being 26 days.

    Just because they are offering a discount for payment within 14 days does not mean everyone will pay in 14 days! The question (and this was a real exam question) says that on average they will take 26 days.

    June 6, 2016 at 9:27 pm #320068
    jingdong
    Participant
    • Topics: 88
    • Replies: 115
    • ☆☆☆

    thanks alot i got it.
    thank you again for your patient help!

    June 7, 2016 at 8:46 am #320202
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54804
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 10 posts - 1 through 10 (of 10 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • sanjarmakh on PPE – Depreciation – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • sanjarmakh on PPE – Depreciation – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • hunaiza.19 on ACCA F2 Revision
  • kita0553 on PPE – revaluation upwards – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • yorqin16 on An organisation’s environment – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in