• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Consolidated co accounts june 2015

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Consolidated co accounts june 2015

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 23, 2016 at 5:02 am #316504
    Anuja Nair
    Member
    • Topics: 365
    • Replies: 353
    • ☆☆☆☆

    For the transaction of borrowing costs, we just have to minus 100 from the finance cost of cyclip right ? Do we have to adjust this in the Retained earnings of the subsidiary ?

    May 23, 2016 at 5:27 am #316507
    Anuja Nair
    Member
    • Topics: 365
    • Replies: 353
    • ☆☆☆☆

    Why for the FV of net assets in S table , we dont have to deduct the FV adj of an increase in depreciation 360 ?

    May 23, 2016 at 8:25 am #316542
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23303
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “For the transaction of borrowing costs, we just have to minus 100 from the finance cost of cyclip right ? Do we have to adjust this in the Retained earnings of the subsidiary ?”

    That 100,000 borrowing cost has been expensed in arriving at the 2,400 profit for the year.

    If it hadn’t been, the profit figure would have been 2,500

    And it’s that 2,500 that needs to be time-apportioned into 3 months pre-acquisition and 9 months post-acquisition

    “Why for the FV of net assets in S table , we dont have to deduct the FV adj of an increase in depreciation 360 ?”

    In the expression “FV of net assets in S table” are you referring to the fair value of S net assets at date of acquisition? If so, that 360,000 additional depreciation relates only to the POST-acquisition period so you wouldn’t expect to find it having an effect on the fair value of S net assets AS AT the date of acquisition

    OK?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Rajpoot on FA Chapter 5 Questions IAS 37 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
  • bizuayehuy on Foreign exchange risk management (1) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kyubatuu on MA Chapter 6 Questions Inventory Control
  • hhys on PM Chapter 14 Questions More variance analysis

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in