• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Dec 2015 – Q3 Retained earnings

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Dec 2015 – Q3 Retained earnings

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 18, 2016 at 10:48 pm #315711
    sara3008
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    Hi Mike, please could you help explain how the consol RE is calculated for this q? Am having some trouble with this area.

    As per ACCA’s website, RE for parent (for consol RE calc) is 26,200 + 24,000 and I don’t understand why it’s adding both YE and beginning of year figures.

    RE for sub at 1 Jul 14 = 14,000 and 10,000 at YE. Answer does not involve deducting pre-acq RE like other questions I’ve practised. Is this due to the annual profit split as a percentage?

    Thanks in advance 🙂

    May 19, 2016 at 6:43 am #315721
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    “Retained earnings – at 1 July 2014 26,200
    – for year ended 30 June 2015 24,000”

    How is that adding both retained earnings at the beginning and at the end of the year?

    “RE for sub at 1 Jul 14 = 14,000 and 10,000 at YE” – NO! Retained earnings of 10,000 are clearly identified as “for the year ended”

    “Answer does not involve deducting pre-acq RE” – because the 14,000 pre-acquisition figure is not brought in to the retained earnings working so there’s no need to deduct it

    May 19, 2016 at 10:29 pm #315888
    sara3008
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 2
    • ☆

    I now realise the stupid reading error I’ve made here! My brain interpreted “for the year ended” to “as at year end” so I was under the misapprehension that you needed to work out pre-acq for S. Thanks very much for clearing things up for me – I definitely won’t be making this mistake again!!

    May 20, 2016 at 4:46 am #315904
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Lesson learned? Then it’s good value

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Ayeshaacca on IFRS 16 Identifying a lease – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 3 – Property Income and Investments – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • @VIBHOR123 on FA Chapter 2 Questions The Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Profit or Loss

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in