• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

APV in Q2 Fubuki Dec 2010

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › APV in Q2 Fubuki Dec 2010

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 17, 2016 at 8:39 am #315425
    Binh
    Member
    • Topics: 41
    • Replies: 78
    • ☆☆

    Dear sir,

    In the answer for Q2 Fubuki provided by BPP Rev Kit, they calculated the benefit of subsidy loan as: Value of loan x (i provided by government – i normal) x (1-tax rate). It is the same as provided by Kaplan text book. It means that the effect of lower tax shield reduces the benefit of lower interest loan.

    However, in BPP text book and as I asked you before in a recent topic, the benefit is: Value of loan x (i provided by government – i normal).

    So what solution is correct?

    PS: just one more question about duration, I combined it here to save the space of forum.
    In answer provided in BPP Rev Kit for question “AWP Co.”, the PV of each cash flow uses the YTM which is the IRR (Duration = Sum( t x PV (CFt) @ YTM )/ Bond price;t=[1,n])

    However, I wonder if we can use the spot yield curve to discount PV of each cash flow to calculate duration, it would save a lot of time as the question has provided the curve! (Duration = Sum ( t x PV(CFt) @ spot of year t)/ Bond price).

    I have tried both and the result is just slightly different.

    May 18, 2016 at 7:24 am #315543
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54656
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You can either take the full interest (less tax) and then the subsidy is the interest saving less tax.

    Of alternatively you can take the net interest, less the tax saving.

    The end result will be the same.

    With regard to your PS, what you have written is OK 🙂

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Rajpoot on FA Chapter 5 Questions IAS 37 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets
  • bizuayehuy on Foreign exchange risk management (1) Part 1 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • effy.sithole@gmail.com on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kyubatuu on MA Chapter 6 Questions Inventory Control
  • hhys on PM Chapter 14 Questions More variance analysis

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in