• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Different treat of CIT with same scenario between Q1 Jun 2013 & Q3 Dec 2014

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Different treat of CIT with same scenario between Q1 Jun 2013 & Q3 Dec 2014

  • This topic has 7 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 9, 2016 at 10:35 am #309542
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 43
    • Replies: 124
    • ☆☆

    Hi Mr. Mike Little,

    May I ask you for a clarification re the Cash-in-Transit treatment when doing consolidation?

    This specifically relates to Q1 Jun 2013 and Q3 Dec 2014. From the look of it both seems display the similar scenario:
    Parent sells goods to Subsidiary; Both shows bank overdraft, but why for Jun 2013 Q1 question, the treat of CIT is to add the amount to bank in asset account; whilst for Dec 2014 Dec one, the treat of CIT is reduce the bank overdraft account?

    Could you show me how one is differenciating from the other? I’m rather confused here.

    Thank you.

    April 9, 2016 at 12:22 pm #309547
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It depends which company has a positive and which has a negative bank account.

    If a company has a bank overdraft and cash in transit is about to be received, surely that will reduce the overdraft

    But if a company has money in the bank and cash is due to be received, that will increase the positive bank balance

    The thing to remember is that we accelerate the in transit items into the records of the receiving company

    Does that make it any clearer?

    April 9, 2016 at 3:11 pm #309562
    Anonymous
    Inactive
    • Topics: 43
    • Replies: 124
    • ☆☆

    Yes, now it makes sense. Thank you.

    April 10, 2016 at 8:17 am #309608
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

    April 25, 2016 at 11:40 am #312610
    msk29
    Member
    • Topics: 82
    • Replies: 65
    • ☆☆

    Hello sir!
    I am confused on dec 2014 qn no 3 note 4.

    In this qn I think its cash in transit,so can you please help with step by step explanation regarding how to deal with it in consolidated SFP.
    Thank you.

    April 25, 2016 at 12:02 pm #312612
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    PLEASE!!!! DO NOT POST YOUR QUESTIONS MULTIPLE TIMES!!

    :-(((

    Here is the answer that I have given to you in your Recent Posts question

    Open two T Accounts

    The first is in Plastik’s records and is called Receivables Account and it includes an amount of $1,200,000 receivable from Subtrak

    The second is in Subtrak’s records and is called Payables Account and includes an unknown amount payable to Plastik

    However, we ARE told that there is $400,000 in transit from Subtrak to Plastik, so let’s record that

    When we accelerate that cash into Plastik’s records, we shall Dr Cash (or, in this case, Dr Overdraft) and Cr Receivables Account with $400,000

    The Receivables line now looks like:

    $4,700,000 – $400,000 + $2,500,000

    And the Overdraft line looks like $1,700,000 – $400,000

    And now the Receivable from Subtrak in Plastik’s records shows an amount of $1,200,000 – $400,000 = $800,000 and the Current Accounts reconcile so we can cancel that $800,000 from both Receivables and Payables

    Now the Receivables line looks like:

    $4,700,000 – $400,000 – $800,000 + $2,500,000 = $6,000,000

    The overdraft line looks like:

    $1,700,000 – $400,000 = $1,300,000 and

    the Payables line looks like:

    $3,400,000 + $3,600,000 – $800,000 = $6,200,000

    OK?

    Reply

    April 25, 2016 at 5:03 pm #312644
    msk29
    Member
    • Topics: 82
    • Replies: 65
    • ☆☆

    I think there was an error sending qns multiple times. I’m so sorry for that.

    But anyways thank you so much sir. Your explanations really helped.

    April 25, 2016 at 7:03 pm #312658
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome (and no harm done about the multiple posts. But please, in future, try to avoid such errors!)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 8 posts - 1 through 8 (of 8 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • kingkong on Accounting for Management – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Ken Garrett on Strategy : real life examples – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • RitikaR29 on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Krishadarwin on Strategy : real life examples – ACCA Strategic Business Leader (SBL)
  • mabdullah31 on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in