Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FA β FIA FFA › Provisions and Contingencies
- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- March 21, 2016 at 7:49 am #307206
Dear John,
This question is from Kaplan (Q173)
Driller Co undertakes oil and gas exploration activities. One of the conditions of the operating license is that Driller must make good any damage caused to the local environment as a result of its exploration activities. As at the year-end date of 31/8/20X4, Driller Co estimated that the cost of rectifying damage already caused at current explotiom sites at $5 million. At that date Driller Co estimated that the cost of rectifying expexted future dage at current exploration sites at an additional $20 million. Driller Co also estimated that all current exploration sites will operate until 20X7 or beyond that date.
How should this information be reported i the financial statements of Driller Co for the year ended 31/8/20X4?
A – There should be a provision classified as a current liability for $5 million
B – There should be a provision classified as a current liability for $25 million
C – There should be a provision classified as a non-current liability for $5 million
D – There should be a provision classified as non-current liability for $25 millionAnswer given – B
The book also explains that,
“Based upon the license terms, damage has already been caused which will cost $5 million to rectify in 20X7 or later. This should be recognised and classified as a non-current liability.” (I dont understand why the answer says ‘current liability’ but in the explanation, it says ‘non-current liability)
Thank you π
March 21, 2016 at 4:35 pm #307245Assuming you have copied the question correctly (I don’t have the Kaplan book), then it is a rather poor question and an even poorer answer π
Given that the dates are not certain, then it should all be shown as a current liability and the answer B is correct. (The answer does not make sense in that nothing in the question suggests that rectifying will only occur after 20X7)March 22, 2016 at 5:24 am #307279Thank you very much John! π
March 22, 2016 at 6:35 am #307288You are welcome π
April 17, 2016 at 11:11 am #310426Hi Mr. Moffat.
“contingent assets and liabilities should not be recognized in financial statements according to IAS 37”
This is given as correct but I do not understand why. I know that sometimes we make a provision or we recognize a contingent asset in BS (according to the probability as mentioned in your courses).
Thank you
April 17, 2016 at 3:43 pm #310455Strictly the statement is true, because if the asset or liability is virtually certain, then strictly it is no longer contingent but is a ‘real’ asset or liability.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.