- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by
.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- Posts
Gd…what was the ruling in whitely and chappell case as you stated in your lecture? Also a id s coupon with items and their price an “invitation to treat”?
Representation of the People’s Act was there to prevent anyone from exercising more than one vote. So what do YOU think the decision was in Whitely v Chappell?
Probably a coupon with items and prices identified would be an invitation
I would think that He was acquitted if the literal rule was applied 1. his voted on behalf of his dead (who couldn’t have voted) and 2. he voted how his dead friend would have voted. However If the golden rule was used he would be found guilty. That’s what I understand from the noted and lecture…but I’m not clear which rule the case is used to support.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.