• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Additional dep. of fair value adjustments

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Additional dep. of fair value adjustments

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • March 3, 2016 at 6:24 am #303144
    Duc Hung
    Member
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 66
    • ☆☆

    According to BPP textbook, upon acquisition of a subsidiary, there are two possible ways of FV adjustment of the net assets acquired :

    1. The subsidiary makes necessary adjustments in their own books. They pass this double entry :

    DR Asset
    CR Revaluation reserve

    After that, they depreciate it with new carrying value accordingly.

    Therefore, I think no consolidation adjustments needed regarding additional depreciation

    2. The subsidiary does nothing about fair value adjustments and the parent has to adjust for it when doing consolidation by making these consolidation adjustments :

    DR Asset
    CR Revaluation reserve

    DR Retained earnings (for additional depreciation)
    CR Asset

    In BPP text book, there is one example in which they adjust for additional depreciation when doing consolidation EVEN THOUGH the subsidiary ALREADY made fair value adjustment in their own books (I saw a revaluation gain in other comprehensive income in the subsidiary’s separate SoCI) and I think of course they already charged additional depreciation. Isn’t it a double-counting ?

    March 3, 2016 at 9:53 am #303212
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    It sounds like it! There are a number of reasons why this situation could have occurred.

    1 You have misread the question!

    2 You have misread the answer!

    3 BPP have mistyped their question

    4 BPP have made a mistake in the answer

    5 There’s something else in the question, other than a fair value adjustment as at date of acquisition, that needed an additional depreciation adjustment

    But, basically, your thinking is correct. If the subsidiary HAS put through the fair value adjustments, then the subsidiary will be calculating depreciation on the adjusted carrying values so there should be no need for a further depreciation adjustment

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • AdityaSairam on Overcapitalisation and Overtrading – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • Ayeshaacca on IFRS 16 Identifying a lease – ACCA (SBR) lectures
  • darshan.69 on Chapter 3 – Property Income and Investments – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • @VIBHOR123 on FA Chapter 2 Questions The Statement of Financial Position and Statement of Profit or Loss

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in