• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

construction contract (MCQ mock exam question)

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › construction contract (MCQ mock exam question)

  • This topic has 12 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 4, 2015 at 1:51 am #287391
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    Q:
    on 1 jan, 2013 Agnes entered into a construction contract that is expected to last 36 months. The agreed price for the construction work was 20mil. As at 30 sept,2013 the costs incurred on the contract were $4mil and the estimated costs to complete the contract were $12mil. In addition to the above costs on 1 July, 2013 Agnes acquired for exclusive use on the contract an item of plant for $1mil. This plant has an estimated useful life of 2 years and will be scrapped at the end of that time.
    On 20 Sep,2013 Adriadne received a payment from the customer of $7mil which amount was equal to the progress billings to date. Adriadne calculates the stage of completion on construction contracts on the basis of progress billings as a proportion of the contract price

    What amount would be reported in Ariadne’s statement of financial position sa at 30 Sep 2013 for the amount due to/from the customer for the above contract?

    A:
    since % of completion is according to progress billing over contract price thus on 20 Sep 2013, the % completion = 7/20*100%= 35%

    w1 Rev Recognised $20mil * 35% = $7mil
    cost incurred on contract general = ($4mil+$12mil)*0.35=$ 5.6mil
    cost recognised specific = $1mil (3/24)=$0.125mil
    total cost recognised=5.6+0.125= $5.725mil

    profit reg=7-5.725=$1.275mil

    w2 cost incurred to date =$4mil
    profit recog= $1.275mil
    progress billing to date=$7mil
    amt due to/from customer = 4+1.275-7= ($1.725mil)

    thus $1,725,000 liability

    but there’s no option of this in answer, instead $ 1,600,000 liability is the correct answer, may i know why?

    December 4, 2015 at 8:50 am #287452
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23311
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Because costs incurred to date should include the 125 element of the specialised plant.

    That brings us to:

    Costs incurred to date (4,000 + 125) 4,125
    Attributable profit 1,275

    Sub-total 5,400
    Amounts invoiced 7,000
    Amount due to customer (1,600)

    OK?

    December 4, 2015 at 5:14 pm #287603
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    yes yes i see, i didn’t include the specific cost at the second part of the question

    December 4, 2015 at 5:39 pm #287616
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23311
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    What confused me were all these women!

    “Agnes entered into a construction contract ”

    “Adriadne received a payment”

    “Ariadne’s statement of financial position”

    December 4, 2015 at 5:44 pm #287617
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    another question
    in a construction that is 80% complete, with following info
    contract price $2mil
    cost incurred to date $1600,000 includes $50,000 specific cost
    estimate cost to complete $550,000

    what is cost recognised?
    answer says $1750,000

    i thought is ((1600,000-50000)+550,000)*0.8 + 50,000 = 1730,000?

    December 4, 2015 at 5:49 pm #287618
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23311
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    150,000 is the forecast loss

    1,600,000 is the revenue recognised

    Therefore costs recognised must be 1,750,000

    LOOK AT THE COURSE NOTES!!!!

    December 4, 2015 at 5:54 pm #287621
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    sorry Mike, how do you get the 150,000 forecast lost?

    December 4, 2015 at 5:55 pm #287623
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    nvm i got it. my brain need to spin again

    December 4, 2015 at 5:57 pm #287625
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    i meant i know how 150,000 come from but i not quite understand it.

    your lecture say

    cost recognised is general (cost incurred to date + estimate cost of completion) * % of completion
    + specific cost related to that period 100%

    thus i use the calculation and reach 1730,000

    why this time round we use the forecast total lost (1600000+550000)-full contract price?

    December 4, 2015 at 6:05 pm #287626
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    we use the forecast method when there’s a lost recognised

    or else stick to your formula right?

    i think this make sense as we need to recognised the lost in full to have a true and fair view (reduce penumbral area of divergence possibilities)

    December 4, 2015 at 8:08 pm #287648
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23311
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    LOOK AT THE COURSE NOTES!!!!

    It’s all explained in there as well as in the lectures

    LOOK AT THE COURSE NOTES!!!!

    December 5, 2015 at 5:02 am #287713
    for8verlik
    Member
    • Topics: 17
    • Replies: 25
    • ☆

    Found it , last 3 Min of ur first construction contract lecture. Yea I missed it. Thanks for your patience haha

    December 5, 2015 at 8:26 am #287738
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23311
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The lectures are recorded in a genuine class room environment. Students listen or, if they switch off, they may miss important points.

    It’s no point having a lecture and failing to pay attention for the entire period!

    The students on the courses were 100% not natural English speakers and lectures lasted 90 minutes.

    If they can do it ……. so can you

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on The Statement of Financial Position – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • Bainamura on The Statement of Financial Position – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • kadamova.f@gmail.com on Associates (IAS 28) – PUPs – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • kadamova.f@gmail.com on Associates (IAS 28) – PUPs – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • bpop on Risk and uncertainty (part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in