Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Question: Marengo Co. Dec 2010 (Nd1 value issue)
- This topic has 5 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- May 27, 2015 at 3:15 pm #249570
Sir,
In this question delta hedge to be done for this for N(d1) required.
I calculated the value of d1 which is -0.0551
so i rounded to -0.06 and took the table value 0.0239 and then subtract 0.5 as it is lower than 0 so it comes to 0.4761.but in the Kit the published answer is as follows;
-d1 = 0.055
N(-d1) = 0.5 + (0.0199+(0.0239-0.0199)/2) = 0.5219
Sir, I can’t understand the above published solution.
Sir, Kindly explain. what i did wrong?
May 27, 2015 at 3:58 pm #249605The question says to assume that the delta of a put option is N(-d1).
d1 = -0.0551
So – d1 = – – 0.0551 = + 0.0551 (two minus’s make a plus)
So what you are looking up is N (+0.0551)
Hope that explains it 🙂
(You actually only need to use the table figure for 0.06 – the answer apportions between the figures for 0.05 and 0.06 which is strictly more accurate, but you don’t really need to do that in the exam).
November 30, 2015 at 10:28 am #286361@johnmoffat said:
The question says to assume that the delta of a put option is N(-d1).d1 = -0.0551
So – d1 = – – 0.0551 = + 0.0551 (two minus’s make a plus)
So what you are looking up is N (+0.0551)
Sir, why do we need to make d1 to be positive insread of negative and vise versa? I see that question says assume N(-d), but what is the reason for that?
It is not in complience whith instruction at the bottom normal distribution table – “If di < 0, subtract the relevant number above from 0·5.”
November 30, 2015 at 11:51 am #286396Hold on – there are two separate things here.
Firstly, because we are valuing a put option (the normal formula is for a call option) the examiner said in the requirements that delate is N(-d1) (and not N(d1) as usual).
d1 calculated as – 0.0551, therefore – d1 = – – 0.0551 = +0.0551
When it comes to actually looking up the value in the tables, you look up the value of +0.0551 following the normal rules. Since you are now looking up > 0, you add the table figure to 0.5.
November 30, 2015 at 12:22 pm #286407Thank you)
November 30, 2015 at 2:06 pm #286424You are welcome 🙂
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.