Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Dec 2010 Question 4 Lamri Co
- This topic has 5 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- April 13, 2015 at 11:14 am #241114
In part (a) of the above mentioned question, we were asked to calculate Lamri’s Dividend capacity after TE’s proposal is taken into account.
I am happy with all the logic of the figures in my BPP kit apart from two issues.
In the question there were these points that are giving me problems:
If Lamri changes Strymon’s policy, it is expected that Strymon would be asked to remit 75% of its after-tax profits as dividends to Lamri and :
Lamri’s, Magnolia’s and Strymon’s profits are taxed at 28%, 22% and 42% respectively. A withholding tax of 10% is deducted from any dividends remitted from Strymon. and:
The tax authorities where Lamri is based charge tax on profits made by subsidiary companies but give full credit for tax already paid by overseas subsidiaries.
S’s after tax profits after TE’s proposal is taken into consideration is $1.32M then we are supposed to remit 75% of these to Lamri with a withholding tax of 10% so we remit a net amount of 0.89M to Lamri but then my BPP kit after the 0.89M deduct a further 0.1M of withholding tax to arrive at S’s retained profits. Isn’t this double counting? The gross remittances should be 0.99 M and we deduct 0.1M withholding tax to arrive at 0.89M so what’s the logic of further deducting 0.1M when it is already deducted. Please explain.
April 14, 2015 at 7:00 am #241222I do not have the BPP answer, but I am looking at the examiners own answer (on the ACCA website).
In his answer he does not deduct a further 0.1M withholding tax to arrive at S’s retained profits and so I am a bit puzzled as to what BPP has done.
December 10, 2015 at 3:52 am #290023How the revenue 5700 n 7980 derived for strymon?
December 10, 2015 at 8:26 am #290089Currently they transfer at full cost price, which is (300,000 x $12) + $2,100,000 = $5,700,000.
The new policy is cost + 40%, which is 5.7M x 1.4 = $7.98M
June 5, 2017 at 6:48 am #390401Hi John,
When calculating Lamri dividend capacity after proposal, why isn’t Lamri paying tax on Strymon’s profit when it has paid on Mangolia?
Is it because in Strymon’s already pays 42% tax on PBT and as bilateral tax treaty exists, Lamri doesn’t have to pay any tax?June 5, 2017 at 8:20 am #390447Yes – that is correct 🙂
- AuthorPosts
- The topic ‘Dec 2010 Question 4 Lamri Co’ is closed to new replies.