Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › Prospective financial information
- This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- November 23, 2014 at 6:52 am #212304
Whenever a negative opinion is provided, does the audit procedures to perform is restricted to analytical and inquiry?
For a cash flow forecast, a negative assurance is provided, so audit procedure such as reconciling cash flow forecast to profit forecast cannot be done.. please do clarify.
November 23, 2014 at 8:03 am #212313In exam Dec 2009 – Apricot question, there was a question based on the audit procedures to perform on cash flow forecast and the answers include:
Recalculate cash receipts from credit sales from revenue figures in profit forecast and ageing stucture of receivables. (IT IS A RECALCULATION NOT INQUIRY AND ANALYTICAL)
November 23, 2014 at 12:09 pm #212390I find it quite difficult to reach a negative opinion on prospective financial information. I mean, how did you arrive at the conclusion that you couldnt give assurance without determining correctness?
Do you mean negative opinion or are you talking about negative assurance?
November 23, 2014 at 2:00 pm #212415does negative opinion does not mean negative assurance???
November 23, 2014 at 2:48 pm #212429NO!!! A negative opinion is a qualified audit opinion “in our opinion the financial statements do not show a true and fair view”
Negative assurance is a non-audit conclusion “nothing has come to our attention to suggest that the figures are wrong”
November 23, 2014 at 2:56 pm #212432Since a negative assurance is provided for PFI, does the audit procedures to perform is restricted to analytical and inquiry?
In exam Dec 2009 – Apricot question, there was a question based on the audit procedures to perform on cash flow forecast and the answers include:
Recalculate cash receipts from credit sales from revenue figures in profit forecast and ageing stucture of receivables. (IT IS A RECALCULATION NOT INQUIRY AND ANALYTICAL)
November 23, 2014 at 4:27 pm #212463Darshini, I’ve answered this some 4 posts ago! I don’t / can’t envisage a situation where you could avoid at least some degree of recalculation as part of your analytical procedures!
The other point to mention is that if in fact your premise is correct and the recalculation point is not accepted by the marker as an appropriate procedure, what have you lost? You certainly haven’t lost a mark. The worst thing that can happen is that that particular point in your answer doesn’t score a mark!
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.