• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

consolidated retained earnings

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA FR Financial Reporting Forums › consolidated retained earnings

  • This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by Kaymakov.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 13, 2014 at 3:41 pm #204304
    Kaymakov
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 30
    • ☆☆

    Dear Sir,

    here’s the task and the solution. I guess the solution is wrong, am right?

    Thank you.

    Ruby owns 30% of Emerald and exercises significant influence over it. Emerald sold goods to Ruby for
    $160,000. Emerald applies a one third mark up on cost. Ruby still had 25% of these goods in inventory at
    the year end.
    What amount should be deducted from consolidated retained earnings in respect of this transaction?

    SOLUTIUON (printed in book)
    ($160,000 / 4) × 25% × 30% = $3,000

    I PROPOSE THIS SOLUTION
    ($160,000 / (1+1/3)) × 25% × 30% = $9,000

    October 13, 2014 at 4:45 pm #204309
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23318
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    160,000, one quarter still left in inventory = 40,000

    Mark up of one third = a pup fraction to apply of 1/3 / 4/3 = 1/4

    So the unrealized profit on the closing inventory is 10,000

    Ok so far

    Emerald sold the goods, Emerald is an Associate, so adjust in Emerald’s retained earnings by reducing the ret ears by the pup of 10,000

    Ruby will then calculate Ruby’s share of Emerald’s post acq profits and come up with a figure that has been reduced by 30% of 10,000

    So the group retained earnings had taken a pup hit of $3,000

    What you have done is calculated the cost of those goods as being 3/4 x 160/4 = 30,000 and then taken the group’s share of that cost.

    The idea of a pup calculation is to find the unrealized PROFIT and then adjust the provision so that the figure carried forward into the next accounting period is that amount of unrealized profit on the closing inventory

    Is that ok?

    October 14, 2014 at 7:49 am #204385
    Kaymakov
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 30
    • ☆☆

    yes, Sir.

    Thank you very much !!!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • John Moffat on Activity Based Costing part 1 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Shabi on Activity Based Costing part 1 – ACCA Performance Management (PM)
  • Ark1 on Variance Analysis (part 4) – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • EricObi on IAS 37 – Best estimate – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in