• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Impairment.

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA SBR Strategic Business Reporting Forums › Impairment.

  • This topic has 3 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 9, 2014 at 2:59 am #194382
    zmbht
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    On 1st January A ltd has a building with a carrying amount of $15m and a fair value less costs to sell of $13m. The value in use is $16m. The property has a tax base of $9m and the tax rate is 25%. The board of A have plans to sell the property. A is unsure how to report the accounting issues arising from this. Please advise.

    September 9, 2014 at 7:27 am #194394
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Well, it’s not impaired because recoverable amount is the HIGHER of value in use and net selling price (value in use is $16m and that exceeds the carrying value so no impairment)

    However, the company has plans to sell and therefore value in use is no longer applicable …. because it’s not going to be used.

    Therefore we need to consider net selling price without any tax implications

    So, impair by $2m down to net selling price and then classify as asset held for sale

    Did I get it right?

    September 11, 2014 at 10:45 am #194648
    mrjonbain
    Moderator
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 2478
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I agree with the above answer. Is there also a deferred tax issue regarding the asset? I would suggest a temporary difference of $4m exists ($13m-$9m) and a deferred tax liability relating to the asset of $1m therefore exists: $4m x 0.25= $1m.

    September 11, 2014 at 11:32 am #194654
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes, I can agree with the deferred tax implication (that I had overlooked)

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • umangkumbhat on What is Assurance? – ACCA Audit and Assurance (AA)
  • ahmadhoney on How to register with ACCA?
  • John Moffat on Interest rate risk management (1) Part 5 – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • osman-the-zephyr@ on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • adebusola on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in