• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Published Account

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Published Account

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 11, 2014 at 9:10 am #189332
    Ivy
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    Sandown (12/09)

    1) For the calculation of other reserve, why there is *transfer of realised profit to retained earning* of $4000(1800+2200)? How can get the figure of $1800?

    2) For the intangible asset -brand,why amortisation to 1.4.09 is (30000/10*6/12) while amortisation to 30.9.09 is (15000/3*6/12)? first the amortisation is divide by 10 years and then 3 years.

    August 11, 2014 at 10:59 am #189358
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Note (iv) in the question. The investment increase from $7m to $8.8m will have been reflected in the past within the “Other Reserve”

    Now the asset has been sold, that $1.8m increase is realised and transferred from an un-distributable reserve – the Other Reserve- to a distributable reserve – the Retained Earnings

    For the brand, it was being amortised over 10 years – hence $30,000/10*6/12 for the half year up to date of re-assessment. With effect from 1 April, the company has indications that the value of the brand is impaired. The impairment review suggests that the carrying value of $30,000 less amortisation for 3.5 years of $10,500 (so $19,500) should be reduced to the recoverable amount ie to the higher of value in use compared with net selling value

    The question tells you that value in use is $12m and that the company has received an offer of $15m for the brand.

    Thus, it should be impaired down to $15,000

    In addition, its estimated useful life is also reassessed to 3 years from 1 April

    So amortisation, based on the impaired value, is $15,000/3*6/12

    OK?

    August 11, 2014 at 1:21 pm #189387
    Ivy
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    thank a lot

    August 12, 2014 at 7:20 am #189560
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23321
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You’re welcome

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Ken Garrett on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • John Moffat on AA Chapter 7 Questions
  • John Moffat on FA Chapter 12 Questions Sales Tax

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in