Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Kindly help with this question
- This topic has 7 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by John Moffat.
- AuthorPosts
- June 24, 2014 at 2:04 pm #177579
J Co makes component M which uses 3 kg of material X. Opening inventory at start of next period is:
X 5000 kg @ $ 4
M 3000 units
Budgeted sales of component M expected to be 48000 units (occurring evenly throughout the year)
Closing inventory at year end is:
X One month’s worth of production
M Two month’s worth salesI’ve got production of M 53000 units. Consumption of X 159000 kg.
I’m confused at what should be the purchases of X?
I’m getting 166000 kg, in book it is 162000.June 24, 2014 at 5:41 pm #177605For M, the opening inventory is 3,000, the sales are 48,000 and the closing inventory is 8,000 (2/12 x 48000). So the production will be 53,000 units.
This means they will need 53000 x 3 = 159,000 kg of X for the production.
For X, the opening inventory is 5,000, they need 159,000 for production. It is the closing inventory of X that is the problem and is where the question is very badly worded – it can be understood in two ways.One way is to do what you did – if they sell 48,000 then overall they need to produce 48,000 and so closing inventory of X is 1/12 x 48,000 x 3kg = 12,000 kg.
This gives purchases of 166,000 kg.The other (maybe better) way is to say that if they are going to produce 53,000 units, the the closing inventory of X for one months production is 1/12 x 53,000 x 3kg = 13,250 kg.
This gives purchases of 167,250 kg.I cannot see how your book gets 162,000!!!
Do they not show any workings with their answer??
June 24, 2014 at 7:11 pm #177634(96000/12)+159000-5000 = 162000
That’s how they have worked it outJune 25, 2014 at 10:12 am #177651Well that makes no sense at all!!!
I think they have made a mistake and that the correct answer is 166,000 🙂June 25, 2014 at 10:53 am #177656Thanks 🙂
June 25, 2014 at 1:25 pm #177670You are welcome 🙂
July 9, 2014 at 2:32 am #178449A favourable fixed overhead capacity variance is likely to arise if a new machine is bought to replace an unreliable one.
A true
B false?
Please helpJuly 9, 2014 at 10:59 am #178465It is true!
It depends how they budgeted the hours available from the unreliable machine.
If they took into account the unreliability in the budgets, then buying a new one will give more capacity and therefore a favourable capacity variance.
They may not have done, but it is ‘likely’ and therefore the answer is ‘true’.
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.