• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Average C/S Ratio

Forums › ACCA Forums › ACCA PM Performance Management Forums › Average C/S Ratio

  • This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by joenzweyyy.
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • May 21, 2014 at 9:38 pm #169995
    malcolmtucker
    Member
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi everybody

    The BPP study text has 2 different ways to calculate the average C/S ratio for multiple products, which give different answers, as far as I can see. I want to know if I’m missing something.

    e.g. Suppose product X has selling price $50 and variable costs of $25 per unit and product Y has selling price of $30 and variable costs of $20 per unit. X and Y are manufactured in the ratio 2: 5. Overall the fixed costs are $150,000. Find the breakeven sales revenue

    X’s contribution per unit = $50 – $25 = $25
    Y’s contribution per unit = $30 – $20 = $10

    Method 1:

    The first way is to find average contribution per mix and average revenue per mix and divide them.
    Contribution per mix = 2 x $25 + 5 x $10 = $50 + $50 = $100
    Revenue per mix = 2 x $50 + 5 x $30 = $100 + $150 = $250
    Average C/S Ratio = Contribution per mix / Revenue per mix = $100 / $250 = 0.4

    Breakeven Sales Revenue = Fixed Costs / Average C/S Ratio = $150,000 / 0.4
    = $375,000

    Method 2:

    The second way is if we are given the C/S ratio for individual products and the fixed costs, as in the question at the bottom of page 78 of the BPP text.
    C/S ratio for X = $25 / $50 = 0.5 or 50%
    C/S ratio for Y = $10 / $30 = 0.33 or 33 1/3 %, to avoid rounding errors

    So if the question instead had stated that X and Y are manufactured in the ratio 2:5, where X has a C/S ratio of 20% and Y has a C/S ratio of 33 1/3 % and fixed costs are $150,000, then, following the textbook, we would calculate

    Average C/S ratio = [ (2 x 50%) + (5 x 33 1/3 %) ] / (2 + 5)
    Average C/S ratio = (8/3) / 7 = 8 / 21 {leaving as fraction to avoid rounding errors}

    Already, the average C/S ratio calculated with this method differs from the one calculated in the first method. The difference is not due to rounding since exact decimals and fractions were used throughout.

    Breakeven Sales Revenue = FIxed costs/ Average C/S ratio = $150,000 / (8/21)
    = $393,750.

    Method 3:
    Using the method which does not involve the C/S ratio at all:
    Breakeven # of mixes = Fixed cost / contribution per mix = $150,000 / $100 = 1,500
    Breakeven # of X’s = 1,500 x 2 = 3,000
    Breakeven # of Y’s = 1,500 x 5 = 7,500
    Breakeven sales revenue = 3,000 x $50 + 7,500 x $30 = $375,000

    Check Back:
    3,000 X’s and 7,500 Y’s cost 3,000 x $25 + 7,500 x $20 + $150,000 = $375,000

    So methods 1 and 2 give the same, (apparently) correct answers.

    Clearly, method 2 is the odd one out.
    Am I skipping a step in method 2, or is it just wrong?

    August 20, 2014 at 7:15 pm #191706
    sara
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    I have the same issue

    August 20, 2014 at 10:47 pm #191727
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Method 2 is not valid – at best, it simply gives an approximation, but that is all. It is not a method to use in the exam.

    Methods 1 and 3 are both valid, which is why they both give the same answers.

    September 24, 2016 at 4:35 am #341527
    haiquyen
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    I think the difference between 2 methods, it is because the difference in average C/S ratios calculated by Method 1 and method 2.

    Method 1: average C/S ratio=(x*C1+y*C2)/(x*S1+y*S2)
    Method 2: average C/S ratio=(x*C1/S1+y*C2/S2)/(x+y)=(x*C1+y*C2)/(S1*(x+y)+S2*(x+y))
    Obviously, following method 2, it is not right to the concept of C/S ratio.

    September 24, 2016 at 10:16 pm #341594
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54684
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Can I suggest that you watch my free lectures on CVP analysis? 🙂

    May 31, 2017 at 5:41 pm #389282
    joenzweyyy
    Member
    • Topics: 3
    • Replies: 9
    • ☆

    I think when you can calculate total sales and contribution always use method 1 as it will always give an answer without having to round off a lot.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • EricObi on IAS 37 – Best estimate – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Ken Garrett on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • John Moffat on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour
  • maryrena77 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • vi234 on MA Chapter 4 Questions Cost Classification and Behaviour

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in