Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Finance Lease Calculations
- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- May 17, 2014 at 8:19 pm #169231
Sir
Can you please explain the difference in calculating NCL and CL in these two scenarions:
1. When the rentals are paid in arrears
2. When the rentals are paid in advanceCan you also please explain the question below?
From BPP 2012
64 Evans 22 minsOn 1 October 20X3 Evans entered into a non-cancellable agreement whereby Evans would lease a new rocket
booster. The terms of the agreement were that Evans would pay 26 rentals of $3,000 quarterly in advance
commencing on 1 October 20X3, and that after this initial period Evans could continue, at its option, to use the
rocket booster for a nominal rental which is not material. The cash price of this asset would have been $61,570 and
the asset has a useful life of 10 years. Evans considers this lease to be a finance lease and charges a full year’s
depreciation in the year of purchase of an asset. The rate of interest implicit in the lease is 2% per quarter.
On 1 July 20X2 Evans entered into another non-cancellable agreement to lease a Zarkov rocket for a period of
10 years at a rental of $5,000 half-yearly to be paid in advance, commencing on 1 July 20X2. Evans considers this
lease to be an operating lease.
Required
Show how these transactions would be reflected in the financial statements for the year ended 31 December 20X3.May 18, 2014 at 8:51 pm #169383I shall not answer the BPP question – the answer should be followable from the BPP text and hopefully my answer to your question about payments in advance / in arrears will be enough to help!
Payments in arrears:- Say the payment intervals are one year (it’s easier to explain for annual payments). A lease is (typically in exams, but not always) signed on 1 January – or the start of the accounting year. Payments in arrears will be on 31 December. When the first installment is paid on 31 December, that payment settles the lease interest together with some part of the capital amount outstanding. Calculate the extent of the lease interest, the rest is capital. On the Income Statement, within Finance Charges, the interest element is found. On the Statement of Financial Position there is the capital amount outstanding, subdivided into current and long term. OK so far?
For payments in advance, payments will be made on the day the lease is signed and then on each anniversary thereafter. So second payment is on 1 January the year after. But that means that on 31 December, the day before we make the second payment, the amounts outstanding are not just the capital amount (current and long term) but also the interest that has accrued over the year since the lease was signed. Again, calculate the interest, deduct from the installment amount and that will give you two figures for the Financial Position as well as one figure for the Income Statement. The two for the Financial Position are the current liabilities for (1) the accrued interest and (2) the current liability for the capital.
The one for the Income Statement is the figure to include within Finance Charges – finance lease interest relating to the year (matching concept)
If you now deduct that capital current liability from the total capital liability, that will give you the long term liability – again, shown on the Financial Position.
Is that ok? Apply the principles to the Evans question and check your effort against the BPP answer. Reconcile the difference. You could always try the question from the opentuition course notes called Giedrius and Giedruola – the answers are towards the end of the course notes
May 31, 2014 at 4:06 pm #172136Thank you for this explanation. I did follow what you are trying to say here. I also tried the question from OT Course notes and I was fine with that. However, please see below solution for above question.
What I don’t understand in this answer is that why do we have to deduct the instalment paid on 1.10.x4 and take that amount to calculate NCL and CL?
Also, why depreciation is calculated over 10 years rather than 6.5 years?
I do not follow their explanation. Can you please explain?
Thank you sir.
*******************************
SOLUTION:Working
Interest on finance lease
$
Cash price 61,570
Instalment 1 October 20X3 (3,000)
58,570
Interest October – December 20X3 (2%) 1,171
Balance 31 December 20X3 59,741
Instalment 1 January 20X4 (3,000)
56,741
Interest January – March 20X4 (2%) 1,135
Balance 31 March 20X4 57,876
Instalment 1 April 20X4 (3,000)
54,876
Interest April – June 20X4 (2%) 1,098
Balance 30 June 20X4 55,974
Instalment 1 July 20X4 (3,000)
52,974
Interest July – September 20X4 (2%) 1,059
Balance 30 September 20X4 54,033
Instalment 1 October 20X4 (3,000)
51,033
*As there is a secondary lease period for which only a nominal rental is payable we can assume that Evans will keep
the rocket booster for the full 10 years of its useful life. If this were not the case it would be depreciated over the 6.5
years of the lease term.May 31, 2014 at 5:18 pm #172165The capital amount outstanding as at 30 September is $52,974
Interest outstanding at that date is $1,059
We need to split the $52,974 into long-term and current liabilities. This is going to involve you working through the payments schedule for another 4 instalments (inclusive of the instalment paid on 1 October) until you arrive at the amount outstanding immediately after the instalment paid on 1 July next year. When you have arrived at the figure, that represents the long-term liability as at this 30 September and, when deducted from $52,974, will give you the current liability as at this September.
But of course that current liability is only the capital obligation. There is also the interest accrued to 30 September and not paid until 1 October $1,059
Depreciation should be charged over the shorter of the lease term and the estimated useful life of the asset. However, where there is an option for the lessee to extend the lease on favourable terms (either a nominal annual rental or even no rental at all!) and it is likely at the inception (a fancy word for “start”) of the lease that that option will be taken up, then depreciation will be over the estimated useful life of the asset.
That appears to be the case here
OK?
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.