Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AAA Exams › answer difference between financial statement risk and audit risk
- This topic has 11 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 9 years ago by MikeLittle.
- AuthorPosts
- April 26, 2014 at 12:48 pm #166385
having analyzing the answer of financial statement risk ,material misstatement risk and audit risk,I found no different between these risk answer,so when asked about financial statement risk or audit risk ,answer will be same as financial statement risk or audit risk?
please reply meApril 26, 2014 at 4:05 pm #166399Arun, there really is no need to include within your post expressions like “please reply me”. If you post it on “Ask the tutor” I shall get back to you!
It’s a difficult one to answer because financial statement risk and audit risk are (to quote a recent SA article) inextricably intertwined.
Financial statement risk is the risk that the financial statements are materially misstated and it’s a risk faced by the company
Audit risk is the risk that the auditor issues an inappropriate opinion, and that’s a risk faced by the auditor
Does that get you any further?
April 26, 2014 at 5:29 pm #166405though I understood about financial statement risk and audit risk, but still I don’t know what to write when asked about financial statement risk and audit risk,
April 27, 2014 at 9:22 am #166438If a question asks about audit risk, go back to basics!
Audit risk is the risk of issuing an inappropriate opinion.
Audit risk is seen as the product of risk of material misstatement and detection risk
Risk of material misstatement is the product of inherent risk and control risk.
Based on the auditor’s subjective assessment of material misstatement risk, the auditor will be able to establish a level of detection risk that reduces audit risk to an acceptable level.
Once having arrived at that level of detection risk that the auditor is prepared to accept giving an acceptable level of overall audit risk, the auditor is then able to determine materiality amounts to be applied in the course of audit tests.
Now, you take it on from there!
Financial statement risk is, in part, a risk facing the directors of a company in that the accounting records of the company are not sufficient to enable the timely preparation of reliable financial statements
If accounting controls and / or internal controls are lacking in their effectiveness, then the processes of recording transactions may not be relied upon giving rise to financial statements which are potentially not free from material misstatement
But inadequate accounting controls is not the only potential cause of financial statement risk. If the company does not have a competent finance department (and particularly a competent chief financial officer) then again there exists a risk that the financial statements will contain material misstatement
Again, you take it from there!
May 22, 2015 at 1:38 pm #247953My qus is here that what if examiner ask in one qus write both of them than how would you relate to scenario because IR and CR are same for both on which DR will be given. How would we differentiate in scenario qus?
May 22, 2015 at 10:58 pm #248017The risks of material misstatement need to be identified and classified into IR and CR. they need to be grouped together, identified and explained (dependent upon what the question asks you to do)
The audit risk element can be applied to any risk involved in ROMM and that risk in general terms can always be summarised as the risk of issuing an inappropriate opinion
But you can do better than just the generic comment.
Take as an example an IR of the entity launching a new business venture
The audit risk (of issuing an inappropriate opinion) is expanded upon by saying something like “The directors have undertaken a business venture where they have no experience. The chances of the company failing to apply all relevant laws, rules and regulations is thereby increased and the auditors will need to plan their work on the assignment to pay particular attention to the procedures adopted for the identification and compliance by the client with those laws, rules and regulations”
I’m trying to illustrate how it’s always possible to EXPLAIN why and how audit risk is affected
Did I succeed?
May 25, 2015 at 7:54 am #248759what i got from your ans is:
If he asks about RMM and audit risk than apply IR and CR is RMM and just general comment on DR in AR… am i right?
May 25, 2015 at 3:59 pm #248849It’s not possible to generalise like that – each question needs to be taken on its own merits
I find that one of the frequent problems faced by students is their ability to misinterpret what a question is asking for.
Before you commit pen to paper, it’s well worth the trouble to read the question requirement two or three times just so that you’re clearing your head what’s being asked.
When you do this, try to put emphases on different key words each time you read the requirement
This is not a good example, but it does illustrate the point
THIS is not a good example, but it does illustrate the point
This is NOT a good example, but …..
This is not a GOOD example, but …..
This is not a good EXAMPLE, but …..
Each different emphasis gives a different meaning to the collection of words
If you do that to a question requirement, it should focus your mind better as to what exactly the examiner is looking for. Try it and see if it works
May 27, 2015 at 12:44 pm #249537Hi, i just want to add one idea, that identifying audit risk is evolved around the concept of WHAT COULD GO WRONG, carfully read through the senarion anout the chanse that any thing could go wrong from recording and classification till preparation and disclosure.
May 27, 2015 at 7:15 pm #249672Thanks Noura
May 28, 2015 at 7:52 pm #249981try doing past papers
june 2014 q1 a
and
dec 2014 q1it will clear ur confusion
May 29, 2015 at 12:13 am #250042And thank you Sharmeen
- AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.