• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Monte Carlo Simulation and Value at Risk

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Monte Carlo Simulation and Value at Risk

  • This topic has 11 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 23, 2013 at 11:54 pm #143487
    toobaalvi
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Can you please breifly explain how simulation works?
    And what is the concept of VAR and how can we calculate it?
    I’ll be grateful!

    October 24, 2013 at 8:18 am #143533
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Basically the way simulation works is by inputting all possible occurrences into a program (in accordance with their probabilities) and then examining the results and the probabilities of different results.

    For Value at Risk, best is to look at the example in the P4 Revision Notes (it is towards the end of the notes).

    October 25, 2013 at 5:13 pm #143696
    toobaalvi
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Thank you so much sir.
    There’s another question. In bbp, terminal value is defined as “value of CFs occurring from period N+1 onwards i.e beyond the normal prediction horizon of periods 1 to N”. Why is it “N+1”? It should rather be just, any CFs after N.

    October 25, 2013 at 5:19 pm #143698
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I realise that the way they have typed it is confusing for you.

    However, cash flows after N are those from one year after N, and 1 year after N is N + 1

    October 29, 2013 at 11:03 pm #144095
    toobaalvi
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    Thanks for the help!

    October 31, 2013 at 3:56 pm #144232
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

    November 5, 2013 at 9:39 pm #144670
    toobaalvi
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    I have seen your notes for VAR. But it just tells you the way to calculate it. I want to know the concept behind it. And what if we come across a value that isn’t in the normal distribution table?

    Secondly i also wanted to confirm that the only assumption of MIRR is that cash flows are reinvested at the cost of capital of the company?

    November 6, 2013 at 7:24 am #144693
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    The notes do explain all you need to know about the concept – it is calculating the amount for which there is a 5% (or whatever) probability of falling below it.

    You will not have a value that is not in the table in the exam (nor really in real life since the tables go up to 0.1%!! It is almost always 5% or 1%)

    Correct about the MIRR assumption.

    November 12, 2013 at 8:19 am #145565
    toobaalvi
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 20
    • ☆

    thank you! 🙂

    November 12, 2013 at 5:14 pm #145694
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome 🙂

    August 23, 2016 at 6:18 am #334630
    hishamy
    Member
    • Topics: 0
    • Replies: 1
    • ☆

    Hi, how often has monte carlo simulation and VAR being examined?

    August 23, 2016 at 6:47 am #334643
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54659
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    I don’t remember Monte Carlo simulation ever having been specifically examined (although it may have been mentioned in a few answers to written parts of questions).

    VaR only came into the syllabus around four years ago and has been examined two or three times since.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • barbjohn on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global
  • Kakui on Equity Law, Ratio Decidendi – ACCA LW Global
  • Nicholas1239798 on IASB Conceptual Framework – Introduction – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Starmoon123 on Strategy formulation (Part 2) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nosiphoceliwedlamini@gmail.com on Revenue – Example 5 (profitable contracts) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in