- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA SBR Exams › IAS 19 EB-Curtailment-Example4
Dear Mike,
Kindly assist me with the explaination on why the difference between PV of FO of 60 and the FV of PA 48, before the Curtailment 12 when added the UGLY Gains of 4, the answer was 16, instead of 8.
Is the 12 not supposed to be the Net Obligation which is the credit balance? Meaning adding the UGLY gains of 4 which are debit balance, there is supposed to be a net credit of 8.
help me i could be missing a principle point.
Thanking you in advance,
Moses
Don’t worry about it – UGLY has GONE! It’s history Any change (which we used to designate as UGLY) should now be recognised in the year in which it arises
I’ll get round to updating the lectures one day, but the course notes are correct