• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Global Pilot paper – for exams up to December 2012

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA AFM Exams › Global Pilot paper – for exams up to December 2012

  • This topic has 6 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 11 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • September 24, 2013 at 2:20 am #141111
    laengjei
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 19
    • ☆

    With regard to the GLOBAL PILOT PAPER – FOR EXAMS UP TO DECEMBER 2012
    How to calculate the Question 2 (b) (ii) ? There is no explanation for the answers provided (i.e. number of contracts, cost of hedge and as percentage of value).

    September 24, 2013 at 6:04 pm #141194
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54696
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Although I will tell you how the number of contracts has been arrived at, the Grabbe variant was removed from the syllabus and cannot now be examined.
    The only option pricing that can be examined relates to share options.

    However, the point is that as the exchange rate changes, so too will the price of options, but the option price will change by N(d1) x the change in the exchange rate.

    So…using the 3 month transaction for example ……to make the changes cancel out, the number of options we need to deal in is the amount of the transaction (75M) divided by N(d1) (0.5386).
    75M / 0.5386 = 278499814 options.
    However we can only deal in contracts of 100,000 options and so the number is 2785

    (The logic is exactly the same as delta hedges when we have share options. As I wrote above, share options can be examined, but the pricing of currency options is no longer in the syllabus)

    November 26, 2013 at 7:17 am #147839
    laengjei
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 19
    • ☆

    Thank you sir =] I noted pricing of currency options will no longer be examined.

    Anyway, with regard to the same question, could you explain how the figures on “cost of hedge” and ” as percentage of value” arrived? (I am sorry, I have spent long time but still could not figure it out…)

    Please do not mind I ask another question in here:

    With regard to same past paper – question 3, the answer provided by ACCA:

    b (i) “This suggest that this project has a 97.3 per cent probability…….” , may I know how is it computed?\

    Many thanks!

    November 26, 2013 at 10:03 am #147865
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54696
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    In the answer to (b) the cost of a call option has been calculated as 3.1581 pence. They are buying 2785 contracts of 100,000, and so the total cost is 2785 x 100,000 x 0.031581 = 8795309. (The answer is a few 100 different because the examiner has rounded in one place and not in the other!!)

    The percentage of value he has taken the total cost of the options divided by the 150M that is at risk.

    For question 3, he has looked up in the normal distribution tables for 1.92, and then added 0.5 to the figure. The logic being that there is a 0.473 probability of being that many standard deviations below the average, but because the distribution is symmetrical there is a 0.5 probability of being above the average. So in total, a 0.973 probability of being above the figure.

    November 26, 2013 at 10:37 am #147878
    laengjei
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 19
    • ☆

    Sorry sir, I think I was editing my question while you replying. It caused some problem in the reply threads…….

    I have another thing to ask for the same question.

    b (iii): how to compute the “weighted years” in the table?

    Many thanks!

    November 26, 2013 at 10:39 am #147881
    laengjei
    Member
    • Topics: 24
    • Replies: 19
    • ☆

    Thank you sir =]

    November 26, 2013 at 10:53 am #147885
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54696
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Multiply the year by the duration of the recovery phase

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • dkessilfie on FM Chapter 1 Questions – Financial management objectives
  • ahmadhoney on ACCA Advanced Audit and Assurance (AAA) The Audit Report 3: Types of Audit Report
  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Ken Garrett on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)
  • Bimasha@123 on Discounted Cash Flow Techniques – ACCA Advanced Performance Management (APM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in