• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

PPE & CONSO

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › PPE & CONSO

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • August 25, 2014 at 1:56 pm #192243
    Ivy
    Member
    • Topics: 7
    • Replies: 7
    • ☆

    bpp Dune (6/10)

    In order to fund a new project, on 1 October 2009 the company decided to sell its leasehold property. From that date it commenced a short-term rental of an equivalent property. The leasehold property is being marketed by a property agent at a price of $40 million, which was considered a reasonably achievable price at that date. The expected costs to sell have been agreed at $500,000. Recent market transactions suggest that actual selling prices achieved for this type of property in the current market conditions are 15% less than the value at which they are marketed. At 31 March 2010 the property had not been sold.

    How to calculate the “loss on reclassification” of leasehold property, the ans is $4000 {37500-(40000*85%)-500}, but I really dont understand tis part.

    bpp Pandar (12/09)

    Why the finance cost has to plus back the 2000 and minus the 2000 again and why the non controlling post acq profit plus back the 2000*6/12

    August 25, 2014 at 8:08 pm #192298
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23322
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You don’t say in your post but I assume that the carrying value of the leased property is $37,500

    Now, what do you not understand? A realistic sale value is 15% lower than the advertised selling value – so $40,000 * .85 = $34,000,000

    Selling costs are $500,000

    So net selling price is $33,500,000

    Gives rise to an impairment of $37,500 – $33,500 = $4,000

    Does that answer your full question or do I have to look up the question Pandar again?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • OmarAlbeity on ACCA BT Chapter 6 – Some legal obligations – Questions
  • Salimbek909 on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT
  • Sefater on Chapter 3 – Property Income and Investments – Individuals TX-UK FA2023
  • adityachaudhry on Discounted cash flow techniques (part 3) – ACCA (AFM) lectures
  • nuripamir on ACCA Administrative Review

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in