Home Forums ACCA Forum F5 Performance Management Forums make v buy decision

This topic contains 6 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by  abdulwahabsiddiq 3 years, 1 month ago. This post has been viewed 12 times

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
• Author
Posts
• #45555

abdulwahabsiddiq
Participant

A factory’s entire machine capacity is used to produce essential components.The production costs of using the machines are as follow.
\$
variable 30000
fixed 50000
total 80000

if all component production was outsourced then the machine could be used to produce othe items that would generate additional contribution of 50000.Assume the fixed cost will still be incurred if production is outsourced.
WHAT IS THE MAXIMUM PRICE THAT THE COMPANY SHOULD BE WILLING TO PAY TO THE OUTSIDE SUPPLIER FOR THE COMPONENT?

WHY IT IS 80000\$ SOME CAN EXPLAIN THIS?

#69335

Seah
Participant

This is in line with relevant costing, variable cost of \$30000 is surely a relevant cost. Then if you outsource the production (buy component from outside), the machine can be used to produce items that will earn \$50000, this sentence was given to show that, if the company did not outsource and continue the production, there will be an opportunity cost of \$50000 which is also relevant cost. Fixed cost will be not relevant because it will still be incurred if production is outsourced, it is a committed cost.
Okay then you come to the point of decision-making, the maximum price that you want to pay supplier should be not more than your own relevant cost which is \$30000 + \$50000 = \$80000. If supplier charges for less than this amount, then it is worth to buy from the supplier (outsource). Do you get it now?

#69336

abdulwahabsiddiq
Participant

i didnt get that what is actually being done and why.I know relevant cost and irrelevant but cant get the logic. if there is no oppertunity cost then how much we have to pay 30000? but why. if we made in house we loose 50000 contribution so that it is relevant but if we give this to outside then we are not loosing oppertunity then it will be irrelevant for this decision? why we are giving 30000 and 50000 simply we shouldnt give more that this out of our pocket? tell me simply why it is being done .

#69337

Seah
Participant

Okay firstly if the machine cannot do anything if company outsource, then there is no opportunity cost and therefore maximum price will be \$30000.

For your third question, it is simple, if you give more out of your pocket, you are making more costs than before, meaning that it is better you continue your production if supplier charge higher than \$80000, as simple as that.

#69338

abdulwahabsiddiq
Participant

correct me if i am wrong. All i understand is that if we make that product we have a cost of 80,000. so we take from supplier that it should not be more than 30000. because variable is revelant and fixed is not. so if this machine can earn 50,000 so more we can pay on 30,000 is 50,000 so total 80,000 this revelant costing rule simply means company should not suffer extra cost e.g is we pay 90000 then it is the 10000 which the company will have to suffer.

#69339

Seah
Participant

Correct, you will not want to buy outside if supplier charges more than what your costs are now, we ignore fixed cost because even when you buy from outside you are still gonna incur it.

#69340

abdulwahabsiddiq
Participant

thanks a lot!

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.