- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 8 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2024 exams, Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Carlisle v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
In this case, Co expected her to communicate …But you said it doesn’t have to be oral ,,,conducting is possible..
What do you think?
They can’t expect her to say I’m agreeing to your offer …
Like you said , buying the product indicates she agreed….
Buying the product was the action that completed the first contract – the contract of buying and selling the smoke balls.
The second contract was the “reward” contract and, in that situation, the one that offers the reward cannot expect billions of responses all saying “I accept” So, in a reward situation, the offeror waives the right of communication of acceptance
Is that ok?