- This topic has 2 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 7 years ago by .
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2024 exams, Get your discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA PM Exams › bottleneck
bpp revision kit mock exam 3 .section B Q.19 .pg241.
I didn’t understand the working.can you please explain me ?
I assume that you are OK with the previous parts of the question.
In which case, employing another senior stylist will mean that there are an extra 9,600 hours available.
For cuts, this will mean that they are able to do 9,600 cuts, and the bottleneck will become the junior stylists because they will still only be able to do 8,000 cuts.
For treatment it will not make a difference because although they will be able to do more treatments (6,400), they will still be the lowest and therefore the bottleneck.
how we got 8000 cuts and 6400?Since a worker too employed total working hours for 4 is 2*2400
why treatment by senior stylist still at the bottle neck .Earlier it was 4800 but now it increased to 6400 right and same again why junior at the bottle neck??