• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

please explain this part ,its from microeconomics notes

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA BT – FIA FBT › please explain this part ,its from microeconomics notes

  • This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by AvatarKen Garrett.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • October 27, 2019 at 12:36 pm #550985
    Avatarfarhaanm
    Participant
    • Topics: 169
    • Replies: 74
    • ☆☆☆

    Provided the selling price is above the average variable cost the firm will produce even if the price is below the average total cost. For example, it would be worth producing and item for an additional cost of $7 if it sold for $10. The $3 difference helps towards covering fixed costs.

    October 28, 2019 at 5:06 am #551046
    AvatarKen Garrett
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 10
    • Replies: 10656
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    VC per unit = $100 and is constant.
    Total FC = 50,000.

    If 5000 units are made then

    AVC = $100, just the constant VC per unit.

    ATC = ($100 x 5000 + 50,000)/5000 = $110.

    If the selling price is $108, say, it is worth making and selling because each unit causes another VC of 100 and generated 108 of revenue. The fixed costs are fixed. The profit/loss would be

    Revenue 5000 x 108 = 540000
    VC 5000 x 100 = 500000
    FC 50000

    There is a loss of 10000, but if no units were made the loss would equal the FC of 50,000. If the FC could be avoided then the firm should do so (eg by closing down) but FC cannot usually be avoided in the short term. Here, even though a profit is not made, the loss is less than it would have been had no units been made and sold. .

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • tomikacharles1986 on Depreciation Introduction – ACCA Financial Accounting (FA) lectures
  • CartelAwper on ACCA BT Chapter 3 – An organisation’s stakeholders – Questions
  • Colossus on Presentation of financial statements – Example 1 (revision) – ACCA Financial Reporting (FR)
  • Jay15 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Inflation (example 5) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • oabilentatiwa on Process Technology and Quality control – CIMA E1

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in