- This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 10 years ago by .
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › opentuition note chapter 9 comprehensive example
Dear Mike, i am very confused about intragroup trading non-current assets, On 31 July 2011, Danute had sold an item of property, plant and equipment to Ausra realising a profit on sale of $ 36,000. Ausra was depreciating this item over its remaining useful life of 4 years. It is group policy to charge a full year’s depreciation in the year of purchase, and non in the year of sale, the answer is that Dr:cost of sale 27,000; Cr: PPE 27,000.
36,000/4=9000; 36000-9000=27000 at this situation why doesn’t it multiply 3/12? may be because this (It is group policy to charge a full year’s depreciation)
but in June 2011 Question 1 Prodigal,Immediately after the acquisition of Sentinel on 1 October 20×0, Prodigal transferred an item of plant with a carrying amount of $ 4m to Sentinel at an agreed value of $5m. At this date the plant had a remaining life of 2.5 years. Prodigal had included the profit on this transfer as a reduction in its depreciation costs. All depreciation is charged to cost of sales. the answer is that Dr: cost of sale 0.8; Cr Plant 0.8
(5m-4m)/2.5×6/12=0.2; 1-0.2=0.8, at this situation it is multiplied by 6/12!!
would you please tell me reason?
many thanks
In Ausra / Danute, it is company policy to charge a full year in the year of purchase ….. and that explains the difference in treatment
thanks alot
You’re welcome
