Skip to content

ACCA Forums

PMMistake in Kaplan kit Question 181?

YYusuf6y ago
Hi guys anyone else spotted the mistake in answers for question 181, should be 18000 not 22000? Most recent kit
John MoffatJohn MoffatTutor6y ago#1
I do not have the Kaplan Kit (only the BPP Kit) but if it is a past exam question then say which exam, because I have all the past exam questions. (If it is a past exam question then it is very unlikely that there is a mistake in the Kaplan Kit because they simply reprint the examiners official answers :-) )
YYusuf6y ago#2
Thanks for the response John. It is in fact question 180(sorry) Business advisor planned to use 3 hours of labor on 700 client services in June. Labor is paid $40 per hour. In June they were actually 900 services provided. Total labor hours were 3240 and the actual labor rate was $42 per hour. The advisor since discovered that due to a change in legislation that meant extra client responsibilities, the budget should have provided for 3 1/2 hours of labor per service. In the answers it is written as variance in hours 2700-3150=550 adverse Which then is given a value of $22000 at the $40 rate!
John MoffatJohn MoffatTutor6y ago#3
I assume that the question was asking for the labour planning variance, in which case the answer is correct. The original standard hours for the actual production are 900 x 3 hours = 2,700 hours. The revised standard hours for the actual production are 900 x 3.5 hours = 3,150 hours The labour planning variance is indeed 550 hours. This is costed at the original standard cost per hour of $40 and is therefore 550 x $40 = $22,000 adverse. Have you watched my free lectures on planning and operational variances? The lectures are a complete free course for Paper PM and cover everything needed to be able to pass the exam well.
YYusuf6y ago#4
Hi John, Indeed it was referring to Labour planning variance. I understand how it is worked out, however I don't understand where the 550 has appeared from...2700-3150 =450. Thanks, Yusuf
John MoffatJohn MoffatTutor6y ago#5
Well spotted :-) I never thought to check that bit of it. Sorry :-( So you are correct - it does seem that there is a mistake in Kaplan's answer :-)
SSyed4y ago#6
Why are we multiplying 3 hours x 900 services ? while the standards indicates that use 3 hours of labour on 700 clients? please guide me it will be a great help as my answer is 14000
John MoffatJohn MoffatTutor4y ago#7
Although the wording of the question is poor, the implication is that they use 3 hours on each of the 700 services. (Think about it - how on earth could they have advised 700 times in just 3 hours in total :-) ). So if they do 900 services they would expect to spend 900 x 3 hours.
Sign into reply to this topic.