- This topic has 47 replies, 19 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by
.
- Posts
Post your comments about December 2011 F2 exam.
What came up? How did you do? How did this paper compare to previous exams?Vote in our Instant Poll
[polldaddy poll="5751853"]- Topics: 0
- Replies: 20
- ☆
Feelings the paper was more on variances but with reversal approach.
the exam was diffuclt for me. maybe ACCA will bring down the pass mark to 40 lol
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 20
- ☆
Some one knows the answer for units where overhead was over absorbed by 3000. Was it 8500 or 11500?
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 20
- ☆
I did for 11500 but I am now regretting as because it was over absorbed means less worked hours.
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
i don’t remeber the question now…
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 2
- ☆
The paper was testing variances to the nth degree with almost every question and then the revers workings to be done for the actual problem on hand. It is as if the papers are getting more difficult with every sitting.
this paper was horrible for me. I think I did almost 20 questions right but for the reamining i just randomly selected answers.I pray if i can take it to 25 answers just for passing purpose.May Allah pass us all
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 1
- ☆
this paper is really tough and time management is not enough..5 questions could not complete….:(
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 17
- ☆
I did the 2 practice exams and every question in my question bank and I still found this exam very difficult. Practice paper was a walk in the park compared to today’s exam. I guessed quite a few be down to luck if I pass
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
just ok, not as hard as I thought. harder than F3, but easier than F1. 1 hour and 20 minutes to finish F2, just so so. but theory questions are really tricky and terrible, god bless me
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
@anisasri said:
Some one knows the answer for units where overhead was over absorbed by 3000. Was it 8500 or 11500?I chose 8500. As you said in following post
@anisasri said:
I did for 11500 but I am now regretting as because it was over absorbed means less worked hours.What about sampling method question? Is it quota, random, multistage or smth else???
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
- Topics: 0
- Replies: 16
- ☆
@shujaattt you do not read the text book, so you do not know how to answer. hope you will fail, because you deserve it, but we, the diligent students should definitely pass, hahahaha
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.