- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 6 years ago by .
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>
Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA LW Exams › Contract
Why is sum identified in a penalty clause not included in an assessment of damages in contract law, if that penalty has already been agreed by both parties under the contract.
Because the Court doesn’t like the idea that parties can pre-agree on penalty clauses! The Court says “That’s our job”
It Is acceptable to agree on a clause that genuinely represents a reasonable estimate of costs where things may go wrong in the future but that reasonable pre-estimate is not in the nature of a penalty
OK?
