• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • CIMA F2 Advanced Financial Reporting
  • F2 Notes
  • F2 Lectures
  • F2 Forums
  • Ask the Tutor

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

CIMA F2 Vertical Groups – Consolidated statement of financial position

VIVA

CIMA f2 lectures Download f2 notes


Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. vickia says

    November 7, 2017 at 9:32 pm

    I am confused by the date Gayle purchased Russell, as it was part way through the year should we not be only taking half of the post acquisition growth in the W4 calculation for NCI?

    Log in to Reply
    • P2-D2 says

      January 1, 2019 at 6:31 pm

      Hi,

      You are correct in that there is a mid-year acquisition but we have been given the retained earnings figure at the date of acquisition and so the post-acquisition profits calculated in the net assets working will be those from the date of acquisition. There is therefore no requirement to pro-rate the post-acquisition profits as this has already been taken care of in the net assets working by using the retained earnings figure at the acquisition date.

      Thanks

      Log in to Reply
  2. sarah2202 says

    August 28, 2017 at 3:19 pm

    Hello,

    It confuses me that when calculating the goodwill of the sub-subsidiary Russell that you take 80% x £55,000. I know you take the parents share but isn’t that the 56% effective controlling interest?

    Kind regards

    Sarah

    Log in to Reply
    • P2-D2 says

      January 1, 2019 at 6:29 pm

      Hi,

      The parent owns 80% of the subsidiary and therefore the group owns 80% of the investment held by the subsidiary.

      Try not to get it confused with the 56% effective ownership that the group has in the sub-subsidiary.

      Thanks

      Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in