I imagine it is correct to add the Goodwill because we are basically trying to determine what is the total net value of the sub on our books that needs to be written off and it is in fact Net Assets (consolidated) + the Goodwill – NCI that represents the Sub in our books.
The cost of investment is 40, and if it measured at fair value it will be 52. The method here is derecorgnise the existing investment then revalued and calculate goodwill.
40% existing share now at fair value : 52 30% additional share: 45 FV of NCI: 32 Net assets: (105) ————————- Goodwill:24.
lakmilankajayasri says
If there is a goodwill impairment before the disposal date, do we have to reduce it from goodwill when calculating the CV of the subsidiary sold?
hassan1989 says
Hi, Why is the good will added 38 and not less (38) as per the profoma
wgk says
The proforma had a typo error – it should be added.
wgk says
8:50 on video
Goodwill (X)
Should it should read
Goodwill X
andrerahming says
Another comment of yours I鈥檓 following. For the inconsistency. Hope we get a reply.
andrerahming says
I imagine it is correct to add the Goodwill because we are basically trying to determine what is the total net value of the sub on our books that needs to be written off and it is in fact Net Assets (consolidated) + the Goodwill – NCI that represents the Sub in our books.
wgk says
Confirmed from tutor that it should be as you suggested in your last message 馃檪
pamkings says
I love your presentations.Keep up the good work
Hamzarizwan says
Do we use the same method irrespective whether the goodwill is calculated at propotionate goodwill method or full goodwill method?
kimhoauehk38 says
Why do you use 40 + 52?
The cost of investment is 40, and if it measured at fair value it will be 52. The method here is derecorgnise the existing investment then revalued and calculate goodwill.
40% existing share now at fair value : 52
30% additional share: 45
FV of NCI: 32
Net assets: (105)
————————-
Goodwill:24.
Please help me to correct, thank you!
kimhoauehk38 says
Please ignore, I misunderstood. Thank you