No. We are only concerned with costs in the factory (there could be other fixed costs as well which we are not interested in for these purposes). Also, it is simply that we assume that all costs apart from materials are fixed in the short-term – they will not all be fixed costs in the long-term.
I guess that you are referring to the calculation of the total fixed costs. They are calculated on the budgeted demand. I explain the reasons for this in the lecture.
can any body please tell me how to solve this question A manufacturing co decides which three mutually exclusive products to make in its factory on the basis of maximising the companies throughput Accounting ratio current data for the products is shown in the table Product X prod y Prod Z selling price p u 60 40 20 direct material cost PU 40 10 60 Machine HRS pu 10 20 2.5 total Factory cost ( excluding dir materials are $150000 The company cannot make enough of any product to satisfy the external demand entirely as machine Hrs are restricted wht is the objective of this question and how should i solve it
Hello John sir, How are you? I hope you are great, First of all thank you for your explanation and your appreciated time, I have a question its mainly related to throughput CM. And concerned to fixed manufacturing costs under throughput CM all manufacturing costs except direct material all consider as fixed costs and you have explained the reason for being DL as fixed but in case of other variable costs like electricity, water and maintenance for example what is the reason for being as fixed costs under throughput CM. Thank you in advance.
Hello John sir, How are you? I hope you are great, First of all thank you for your explanation and your appreciated time, I have a question its mainly related to throughput CM. And concerned to all manufacturing costs except direct material all consider as fixed costs and you have done the reason for being DL as fixed but in case of other variable costs like electricity, water and maintenance for example what is the reason for being as fixed costs under throughput CM. Thank you in advance.
Hi John. Could you explain why when calculating profit using optimal production (20k units of A and 8k of B), we use fixed cost multiplied by 20k units of A and 10k units of B (and not 8k units)
I do explain this in the lecture! It is because the budget will have been prepared using the budgeted production. Even though the actual production is different, the total fixed costs will not change by definition (the total is fixed whatever happens).
I’m sitting my PM exam in March 2020 and your lectures are awesome!
Quick question, the lecture and notes state the Throughput Accounting Ratio is worked out by dividing by return or cost by the factory hours, just to clarify does this change depending on what the bottle neck resource is?
Hi Sir, Thank you for this well made lecture! I was able to understand all the details regarding throughput accounting and Key factor Analysis.
I now only hope that you would also take some of your free time to make a lecture on Bottleneck resource to explain how u would approach the Example question given.
(A short 3-4 mins video would suffice, in which you run over how to do the example).
Hi John, I was going through an MCQ question on Throughput Account and came across a question, it was on the Through Put Accounting Ratio. I wanted to calculate the total factory cost and came across an admin cost.
I Added the Labour cost, Fixed cost and the Admin cost and discovered later that the Admin cost is not supposed to be added tot he total factory cost.
I just wanted to confirm that admin cost should not be added to total factory cost.
On the lecture notes in Chapter 5 there is a point called Bottleneck Resources, i see this was not discussed or mentioned at all in the lectures. how important is this for the exam?
Hi dear john, Iβv watched your lecture completely and i got all of the topics and cases except the last calculation in your last lecture in throughput accounting It says the ratio should be more than 1 But i couldnt understand its logic If it was selling price per u divided by cost per u I could see the logic because selling price covers the costs and its 1 or more than 1 and its ok But here is profit on costs and it says it should be more than one to cover the costs I assumed that if the profit or return per hour is 0.5 and cost per hour hour is 2 Answer will be less than 1 but its ok Because its profit/return and no selling priceβ¦
I think i misunderstood a part because it doesnt match with your lecture
But the throughput return is certainly not the profit – it is the selling price less the materials cost. This is the whole point of throughput accounting. The selling price less the materials cost needs to be more than the other costs (which are all assumed to be fixed under throughput accounting) for there to be a profit – so the TAPR needs to be more than 1.
I do suggest that you watch the lectures again π
Thanks John. If I may ask, what’s the best course of action for products with TPAR <1? What are some of the challenges of using this approach. How can we make decisions in a TPA environment?
Hi Sir, Good day.
Regarding the cost per factory hour’s, total factory cost, Is it safe to say the other term for factory cost is fixed cost then?
No. We are only concerned with costs in the factory (there could be other fixed costs as well which we are not interested in for these purposes). Also, it is simply that we assume that all costs apart from materials are fixed in the short-term – they will not all be fixed costs in the long-term.
Hi there John , i appreciate your work so much
I am here to point out an error , i think in the lecture notes for Example 2 answers on Throughput Accounting
Units produced for Product B are supposed to be 8000 units not 10000 as depicted within the answers to the exercise
No – the answer is correct.
I guess that you are referring to the calculation of the total fixed costs. They are calculated on the budgeted demand. I explain the reasons for this in the lecture.
can any body please tell me how to solve this question
A manufacturing co decides which three mutually exclusive products to make in its factory on the basis of maximising the companies throughput Accounting ratio
current data for the products is shown in the table
Product X prod y Prod Z
selling price p u 60 40 20
direct material cost PU 40 10 60
Machine HRS pu 10 20 2.5
total Factory cost ( excluding dir materials are $150000 The company cannot make enough of any product to satisfy the external demand entirely as machine Hrs are restricted
wht is the objective of this question and how should i solve it
You must ask this kind of question in the Ask the Tutor Forum and not as a comment on a lecture.
Hello John sir,
How are you?
I hope you are great,
First of all thank you for your explanation and your appreciated time, I have a question its mainly related to throughput CM. And concerned to fixed manufacturing costs under throughput CM all manufacturing costs except direct material all consider as fixed costs and you have explained the reason for being DL as fixed but in case of other variable costs like electricity, water and maintenance for example what is the reason for being as fixed costs under throughput CM.
Thank you in advance.
You are correct in saying that in practice some costs might well remain variable – it is not an ‘exact science’.
However, for the exam there is no argument – it is only materials that you consider as being variable.
Thank you sir thank you so much.
You are welcome π
Hello John sir,
How are you?
I hope you are great,
First of all thank you for your explanation and your appreciated time, I have a question its mainly related to throughput CM. And concerned to all manufacturing costs except direct material all consider as fixed costs and you have done the reason for being DL as fixed but in case of other variable costs like electricity, water and maintenance for example what is the reason for being as fixed costs under throughput CM.
Thank you in advance.
Hi John. Could you explain why when calculating profit using optimal production (20k units of A and 8k of B), we use fixed cost multiplied by 20k units of A and 10k units of B (and not 8k units)
Many thanks!
I do explain this in the lecture! It is because the budget will have been prepared using the budgeted production. Even though the actual production is different, the total fixed costs will not change by definition (the total is fixed whatever happens).
Ooh ok thank you
You are welcome π
Hi John,
I’m sitting my PM exam in March 2020 and your lectures are awesome!
Quick question, the lecture and notes state the Throughput Accounting Ratio is worked out by dividing by return or cost by the factory hours, just to clarify does this change depending on what the bottle neck resource is?
Thanks
We calculate the return per hour based on the time in the bottleneck resource.
Hi John,
I don’t see any written solution/lecture video for Example 3 on Bottleneck Resource. Could you please let me know where solutions are provided?
Thanks.
Look at the contents page of the lecture notes and you will see that solutions are provided to all examples π
Seen. Thanks
Please tell me where is the solution of Example 3. Thanks in advance
hi Sir,
Thank you for the well explained notes and lectures.
By any chance are you going to do a lecture video on example 3 of the bottleneck resources?
thanks.
Thank you for your comment.
I will record a video when I have the time, but until then there is a printed answer in the free lecture notes.
Thank you very much found them.
Great π
Hello, can I check where did you find them?
Try looking at the contents page π
Good evening sir,
I have found out that I can draw a conclusion in solving the throughput and key factor analysis.
Step 1, Contribution/u or Throughput and then contribution/u/h or Return blablabla, so that I can judge which is the better/best option
Step 2, considering how many units of each product should be produced, and then the total contribution
Step 3, Work out and eliminate Fixed or “Fixed” costs, then the best profit
I suggest that your lecture is really helpful, really appreciate it!!!!????
BTW, Looking forward to the ‘bottleneck section’ since I have to check my answer.
Have a good weekend, sir
Lancelot Wang Xue-Ran from China
Hi Sir,
Thank you for this well made lecture!
I was able to understand all the details regarding throughput accounting and Key factor Analysis.
I now only hope that you would also take some of your free time to make a lecture on Bottleneck resource to explain how u would approach the Example question given.
(A short 3-4 mins video would suffice, in which you run over how to do the example).
Thank you yet again for your generous work.
Regards,
Darin P. Stephen
I will record a lecture when I have the time. However, I guess you realise that there is an answer in the lecture notes? π
Hi John,
I was going through an MCQ question on Throughput Account and came across a question, it was on the Through Put Accounting Ratio.
I wanted to calculate the total factory cost and came across an admin cost.
I Added the Labour cost, Fixed cost and the Admin cost and discovered later that the Admin cost is not supposed to be added tot he total factory cost.
I just wanted to confirm that admin cost should not be added to total factory cost.
Correct. It is only the costs in the factory – i.e. the production costs.
Those like admin. costs and distribution costs are non-production costs personally suggest~
Excellent lecture .
Thanks sir!
Thank you for your comment π
Good afternoon,
On the lecture notes in Chapter 5 there is a point called Bottleneck Resources, i see this was not discussed or mentioned at all in the lectures. how important is this for the exam?
It is relevant for the exam. There is no lecture at the moment, but the notes together with the example (and answer) should be clear enough.
Hi dear john,
Iβv watched your lecture completely and i got all of the topics and cases except the last calculation in your last lecture in throughput accounting
It says the ratio should be more than 1
But i couldnt understand its logic
If it was selling price per u divided by cost per u I could see the logic because selling price covers the costs and its 1 or more than 1 and its ok
But here is profit on costs and it says it should be more than one to cover the costs
I assumed that if the profit or return per hour is 0.5 and cost per hour hour is 2
Answer will be less than 1 but its ok
Because its profit/return and no selling priceβ¦
I think i misunderstood a part because it doesnt match with your lecture
Iβll be thankful if you help me in this way:)
But the throughput return is certainly not the profit – it is the selling price less the materials cost. This is the whole point of throughput accounting. The selling price less the materials cost needs to be more than the other costs (which are all assumed to be fixed under throughput accounting) for there to be a profit – so the TAPR needs to be more than 1.
I do suggest that you watch the lectures again π
Thanks dear john,I got the point
You are welcome π
Thank you sir, you are my hero
You are welcome π
Hi John,
Will there be a bottleneck resource lecture video?
I see an Example 3, however no video to go with it?
I look forward to your reply π
Maybe one day – when I have the time π
However the example in the notes (together with the answer in the notes) should make it clear.
If not then ask in the Ask the Tutor Forum.
Thanks John. If I may ask, what’s the best course of action for products with TPAR <1? What are some of the challenges of using this approach. How can we make decisions in a TPA environment?
Is there going to be a lecture on this ?
Hello !
There is no lecture on bottleneck resource but it is there in the notes complete with an example. Is it not part of the syllabus anymore ?