• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA FA:
  • FA Notes
  • FA Lectures
  • FA Practice Questions
  • FA Flashcards
  • FA Revision Lectures
  • Revision Mock Exam
  • FA Forums
  • Ask the Tutor
  • Ask AI (New!)

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets – ACCA (FA) lectures

VIVA

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. alll says

    May 4, 2023 at 11:36 am

    Thank you for the lecture
    If the accident happened after the year end why do we show it at all on the statements- it should be on next years statements?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      May 4, 2023 at 5:27 pm

      If it happened after the year end, then yes it will be on next years statement. I do not say differently in the lecture 馃檪

      Log in to Reply
      • alll says

        May 21, 2023 at 3:46 pm

        but you do say that we will attach a note to last years statement?

      • John Moffat says

        May 21, 2023 at 6:52 pm

        Yes, we will disclose it by way of a note if the amount involved is material.

    • JonatLa says

      October 9, 2023 at 8:24 pm

      John, I’m interested in how we classify and treat guarantees and warranties. The probability of product failure giving rise to a claim could be less than 2%, but the volume of sales might make at least one claim per year, virtually certain.

      Let’s say we allow a provision, based upon the expected claims in the year, does this liability ‘behave’ in the same way as, E.g. a provision for bad and doubtful debts? Thank you.

      Log in to Reply
      • JonatLa says

        October 9, 2023 at 8:39 pm

        Ah… No need to worry, I see now the warranty case may be treated as an allowance, and not a provision.
        Back to FR!

  2. amjad says

    May 25, 2022 at 8:41 pm

    Dear sir, First of all thank you for helping students like us.

    My understanding of contingent liability is that if obligation is probable then we should recognize it the financial statement.
    If obligation is possible then disclose it in the financial statements by way of a note.
    and if obligation is remote, do nothing.

    Is my understanding is correct, if not please specify the correct treatment.

    Thanking you in anticipation.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      May 26, 2022 at 6:37 am

      It is correct 馃檪

      Log in to Reply
      • amjad says

        May 28, 2022 at 4:29 pm

        Thank you very much sir for your prompt reply, iam really thankful for this but by listening to ur lecture i came to the conclusion that if accident happen before the year we will treat the contingent liability like provision but if the accident happens after the year end and the obligation to pay is probable or possible we will write a note and if its remote we will do nothing.

        Am i correct please explain

      • John Moffat says

        May 29, 2022 at 7:23 am

        Correct 馃檪

    • Rogersabdul says

      June 13, 2022 at 1:07 am

      Thank you very much for this wonderful help that you offer to us. I feel good listening to your lectures and it makes me understand what I want to know.

      Log in to Reply
      • John Moffat says

        June 13, 2022 at 7:25 am

        Thank you for your comment 馃檪

      • John Moffat says

        June 13, 2022 at 7:25 am

        Thank you for your comment 馃檪

  3. st074693@gmail.com says

    January 1, 2022 at 9:42 pm

    Hi sir and thank you for all lessons!!!

    if the accident happens after the year end why do we even consider showing it in THIS YEAR statements?
    why not simply leave it for next years statement

    Log in to Reply
  4. Asif110 says

    November 11, 2020 at 6:24 pm

    Sir, shouldn鈥檛 probable – possible – and remote tests be done only for contingent liabilities/assets; as the provision is certainly a liability and will have to be paid ?

    I am somewhat confused because I find these tests mentioned for Provision – whose payment is not contingent (dependent). Only the time and amount is uncertain. But it will be paid and recorded.

    Log in to Reply
    • Tianna says

      March 14, 2022 at 11:53 pm

      I was thinking this too.
      I went to the BPP text and there is a note under the contingency learning section that says ” If an obligation is probable, it is not a contingent liability, instead a provision is needed and if it is remote, it requires no disclosure. ”

      So my understanding is that Probable falls under Provisions, but Possible and Remote falls under Contingent Liability.

      Hope this helps.

      Log in to Reply
  5. amritash says

    May 27, 2020 at 11:36 am

    Really good resources. Thank you

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      May 27, 2020 at 2:37 pm

      Thank you for your comment 馃檪

      Log in to Reply
  6. shagor says

    April 6, 2020 at 2:55 pm

    About the contingent liability, we have to write a note if the accident takes place after the current year. I want to know how long after the end of the year we’ll have to write a note in the current year’s financial statement?

    Log in to Reply
  7. vishnutv says

    January 1, 2020 at 5:03 am

    In contingent asset example in court case if we lose case we won鈥檛 receive money ? Right
    It鈥檚 not clear video sound

    Log in to Reply
    • accadenislux says

      April 2, 2020 at 10:01 am

      Yes, that’s right.

      Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 路 Support 路 Contact 路 Advertising 路 OpenLicense 路 About 路 Sitemap 路 Comments 路 Log in