• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA AFM:
  • AFM Notes
  • AFM Lectures
  • AFM Revision Lectures
  • AFM Forums
  • Ask the Tutor
  • Ask AI (New!)

June 2025 ACCA Exams

How was your exam? Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for September 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

The valuation of debt finance, and duration (part 3) – ACCA (AFM) lectures

VIVA

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. mariochase24 says

    October 24, 2024 at 1:42 am

    Not sure if you still monitor the comments but what is the difference between the macaulay duration and the payback period we did in previous fm exams?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      October 24, 2024 at 7:48 am

      Although the idea is similar to the discounted payback period, the Macaulay duration takes into account all of the flows and gives an average. The discounted payback period ignores the flows after the payback period.

      Log in to Reply
      • mariochase24 says

        October 24, 2024 at 11:30 pm

        Thank you

  2. farhanahaque says

    January 4, 2022 at 5:00 pm

    I love your videos thank you so much!!! God bless you

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      January 5, 2022 at 8:08 am

      Thank you for your comment 馃檪

      Log in to Reply
  3. confideans says

    May 25, 2020 at 7:16 am

    Macaulay Duration is the length of time taken by the investor to recover his invested money in the bond through coupons and principal repayment.

    According to your explanation, it is an average time to get half the value.

    Could you please clarify it? Thank you.

    Log in to Reply
  4. momanyi says

    May 3, 2020 at 11:02 pm

    This is very helpful. I am mastering the techniques.

    Log in to Reply
  5. edite says

    February 23, 2020 at 10:36 am

    Hi,

    I really do not understand, why you are saying that the project is delivering half of its value in 2.2 years. In my understanding it delivers all money invested including required return in 2.2 years.

    Thank you!

    Edite

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      February 23, 2020 at 10:54 am

      Its value is the benefit of the returns – not the initial investment.

      Log in to Reply
  6. Sarosh Awan says

    May 18, 2019 at 12:00 pm

    Dear Sir, If the steps to working out Macaulay Duration and project duration are same what is the main difference between the two.

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      May 18, 2019 at 4:37 pm

      One is used to consider bonds, and the other is used as a way of appraising investments in new projects.

      Log in to Reply
  7. John Moffat says

    March 5, 2019 at 10:57 am

    aditya13: You are allowed to take any calculator provided it does not display text at all.

    However, given that it is your workings that are marked (rather than the final answer) it is much better to have a scientific calculator rather than a financial calculator.

    Log in to Reply
  8. aditya13 says

    March 5, 2019 at 10:37 am

    Hello sir, All your lectures are very helpful and informative!
    I have a small doubt regarding the examination rules.
    Are we allowed to take an financial calculator in the exam as there are log and exponential calculations involved in few chapters?

    Log in to Reply
  9. danique says

    September 20, 2018 at 3:53 pm

    Hi John in eg 7….. The project duration

    When calculating the NPV we ignore the initial investment? Cause I’m seeing 307,162
    But I assumed we working a regular NPV and I subtracted the 240000 and ended up with 10 years duration which I thought to be long …..

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      September 20, 2018 at 5:01 pm

      It is just as with the Macauley Duration. We divide by the PV of the future cash flows, not the NPV.

      Log in to Reply
  10. Ihmant says

    August 16, 2018 at 10:29 am

    Dear John,
    Completely lost in this one. When I compare this to ACCA September/December 2016 Sample Answers, the question about Fernhurst, they calculate the project duration ar half of the value in 2.78 years by dividing the NPV of the project with multiplied proportions of the returns, eg (1×0.165)+(2×0.227)+(3×0.275)+(4×0.333) that gives the answer of 2.78 years. If I solve it using the technique in presentation I get 8.84 years, which seem unrealistic. Also there is no answer for Ex7 in course notes, and the course notes (pg. 53) state that the project duration “is a measure of the average time over which a project delivers it’s value”, other sources tell this is a measure of the time the project delivers half it’s value?

    Which method is the correct one? Am I using the project duration where necessary or I should be using another technique?

    Log in to Reply
    • John Moffat says

      August 16, 2018 at 11:59 am

      Both techniques give the same result – I don’t know what went wrong in your calculation.

      Think about it – multiply the PV’s by the years and then dividing the total by the NPV has to give the same as multiplying the PV/NPV but the years and then adding up.

      Also, the two statements that you write in inverted commas are both saying the same thing 馃檪

      Log in to Reply
  11. John Moffat says

    August 1, 2018 at 8:15 am

    As I say in the lecture, the arithmetic is the same – the Macaulay duration applies to bonds, the project duration applies to projects!

    Log in to Reply
    • neka4real2004 says

      August 2, 2018 at 12:11 am

      Ok. Thank you

      Log in to Reply
      • John Moffat says

        August 2, 2018 at 7:46 am

        You are welcome 馃檪

  12. neka4real2004 says

    July 31, 2018 at 6:06 pm

    So Please, what is the difference between the Macaulay duration and the Project Duration???

    Log in to Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Copyright © 2025 路 Support 路 Contact 路 Advertising 路 OpenLicense 路 About 路 Sitemap 路 Comments 路 Log in