• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for March and June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Forecasting

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA MA – FIA FMA › Forecasting

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 3 years ago by John Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • December 28, 2021 at 1:44 pm #644953
    James124
    Participant
    • Topics: 166
    • Replies: 138
    • ☆☆☆

    Bpp kit (4a.3)
    A regression equation Y = a + bX is used to forecast the value of Y for a given value of X.
    Which TWO of the following increase the reliability of the forecast?

    A) A correlation coefficient numerically close to 1
    B) Working to a higher number of decimal places of accuracy
    C) Forecasting for values of X outside the range of those used in the sample
    D) A large sample is used to calculate the regression equation

    Answer is A and D.

    My query:
    (1) B is more correct than A. A can be wrong if the value is 1.1 or -1.2 or any greater and closer value to 1.
    (2) Why B is not possible?

    General query
    (3) Can you please tell strong correlation range? I studied +-0.8 but in BPP kit it is saying that 0.73 is even strong in Question (4a.5).

    December 28, 2021 at 5:16 pm #644964
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    1. It is arithmetically impossible to end up with a coefficient that is great than 1.

    2. Working to more decimal places doesn’t make things any more linear.

    3. There is no specific value that makes a relationship strong (I don’t know where you were taught that it was 0.8 !!). It is not even possible to say that 0.73 is necessarily strong, but in this sort of question it is better to eliminate the 2 that are certainly not true so as to then be left with the 2 required by the question.

    December 29, 2021 at 7:22 am #644986
    James124
    Participant
    • Topics: 166
    • Replies: 138
    • ☆☆☆

    I have studied that strong correlation is >0.8 and <1 while perfect correlation =1 and <0.8 is partial correlation in Kaplan Study Text.
    Thank you tutor.

    December 29, 2021 at 9:07 am #644993
    John Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54655
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    You are welcome.

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • The topic ‘Forecasting’ is closed to new replies.

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • hhys on PM Chapter 4 Questions Environmental Management Accounting
  • singhjyoti on Conceptual Framework – ACCA SBR lecture
  • John Moffat on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • azubair on Time Series Analysis – ACCA Management Accounting (MA)
  • Gowri7 on Relevant cash flows for DCF Working capital (examples 2 and 3) – ACCA Financial Management (FM)

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in