• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • FIA Forums
  • CIMA Forums
  • OBU Forums
  • Qualified Members forum
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

Save 20% on ACCA & CIMA Books

Interactive BPP books for June 2026 exams, recommended by OpenTuition.
Get discount code >>

Time value of money

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FM Exams › Time value of money

  • This topic has 3 replies, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by AvatarJohn Moffat.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • July 21, 2021 at 4:34 am #628956
    AvatarSourav9271
    Participant
    • Topics: 164
    • Replies: 117
    • ☆☆☆

    Sir,
    The question asked to quote minimum contract price.
    I got till 125,696
    But I didn’t quite understand why further discounting .

    Wasn’t DCF already incorporated whilst reaching at 125,696.

    July 21, 2021 at 10:48 am #628987
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54839
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Please do not post links like this, it is illegal for us because of copyright laws.

    For the minimum contract price, the NPV must be zero. Therefore the PV of the receipt in 2 years time must be 125,696. That to be the PV of the contract price, the amount itself must be 125,696 divided by the two year discount factor as explained in the answer.

    July 21, 2021 at 11:57 am #628998
    AvatarSourav9271
    Participant
    • Topics: 164
    • Replies: 117
    • ☆☆☆

    Sorry sir I won’t attach any links ..

    However why does the amount itself be discounted..

    Wasn’t 125696 reached as a result of discounting.?

    July 21, 2021 at 3:35 pm #629038
    AvatarJohn Moffat
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 57
    • Replies: 54839
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Yes it was reached as a result of discounting – it is the PV of other flows.

    For the NPV to be zero, the PV of the receipt must also be equal to 125,696 (not the receipt itself, but the PV of the receipt).

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE Exams – Instant Poll

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • SAUMYAMUNDHRA on MA Chapter 2 Questions Sources of Data
  • SAUMYAMUNDHRA on MA Chapter 1 Questions Accounting for Management
  • Sid24012003 on ACCA FR Chapter 22 Investor analysis Questions
  • Anna1207 on ACCA P4 Question 1 December 2014 part 1
  • BigT on The nature and structure of organisations – ACCA Paper BT

Copyright © 2026 · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Privacy Policy · Cookie settings · Comments · Log in