- This topic has 1 reply, 2 voices, and was last updated 4 years ago by
.
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- Posts
Neeson & Co
“However, contingent fees could be used for corporate finance services offered to Neeson & Co’s non-audit clients. A self-interest threat may still arise, and the fi rm should consider the significance of any threat by reference to the nature of the engagement, the range of possible fees and the basis for determining the fee.”Does it still valid that the contingent fees arrangement can be provided to the non-audit client with safeguard applied?
You mean “IS it still valid” – answer is yes.
I suggest you spend a little time understanding the difference between the verb “to be” and the verb “to do” – just browse the internet e.g. https://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-does-and-vs-is
Viewing 2 posts - 1 through 2 (of 2 total)
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.