• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free ACCA & CIMA online courses from OpenTuition

Free Notes, Lectures, Tests and Forums for ACCA and CIMA exams

  • ACCA
  • CIMA
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Books
  • Forums
  • Ask AI
  • Search
  • Register
  • Login
  • ACCA Forums
  • Ask ACCA Tutor
  • CIMA Forums
  • Ask CIMA Tutor
  • FIA
  • OBU
  • Buy/Sell Books
  • All Forums
  • Latest Topics

June 2025 ACCA Exam Results

Comments & Instant poll >>

20% off ACCA & CIMA Books

OpenTuition recommends the new interactive BPP books for June 2025 exams.
Get your discount code >>

Ias10

Forums › Ask ACCA Tutor Forums › Ask the Tutor ACCA FR Exams › Ias10

  • This topic has 4 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years ago by MikeLittle.
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • April 16, 2013 at 7:58 pm #122662
    hasanali95
    Member
    • Topics: 239
    • Replies: 248
    • ☆☆☆

    Inventory at a warehouse was valued at its cost of $460,000 at the yr end but later on 70%of it was sold for$ 238000.so how would we write it down?would we compare 70% cost with the nrv or the full cost vs the nrv?

    April 17, 2013 at 3:57 pm #122733
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    70% of 460,000 is 322,000. So, of the 460,000, 322,000 can be sold for only 238,000. The remainder of the inventory valued at cost at an amount of 138,000 ( subject to that not also requiring a write-down ) is presumably correctly valued. The adjusted value of inventory should therefore be 138,000 + 238,000 = a revised value of 376,000 instead of 460,000.

    However ……. if the cause of the fall in value was due to some “subsequent event” not foreseeable as at the year end, then the 460,000 was presumably correct and the cause of the fall would be shown as a non-adjusting subsequent event – assuming that it is material in the context of the financial statements

    April 18, 2013 at 12:02 pm #122794
    hasanali95
    Member
    • Topics: 239
    • Replies: 248
    • ☆☆☆

    But in the qs Waxwork (6/09) ,bpp kit has directly compared the whole of the460k with the 70%sold 🙁

    April 18, 2013 at 1:37 pm #122804
    nps1976
    Member
    • Topics: 1
    • Replies: 67
    • ☆☆

    The question you are referring to states that the inventory is all of the same class, thus telling you that the NRV of the remaining inventory also needs to be written down.

    April 18, 2013 at 4:37 pm #122813
    MikeLittle
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 27
    • Replies: 23327
    • ☆☆☆☆☆

    Thank you nps! 🙂

    I’m not sure how I am expected to answer a question when I am not given complete information!

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
Log In

Primary Sidebar

Donate
If you have benefited from our materials, please donate

ACCA News:

ACCA My Exam Performance for non-variant

Applied Skills exams is available NOW

ACCA Options:  “Read the Mind of the Marker” articles

Subscribe to ACCA’s Student Accountant Direct

ACCA CBE 2025 Exams

How was your exam, and what was the exam result?

BT CBE exam was.. | MA CBE exam was..
FA CBE exam was.. | LW CBE exam was..

Donate

If you have benefited from OpenTuition please donate.

PQ Magazine

Latest Comments

  • crabtreef on PM Chapter 9 Questions Short-term decision making
  • Abdjr11 on Financial management objectives – ACCA Financial Management (FM)
  • John Moffat on FA Chapter 6 Questions Depreciation
  • Masterodad on FA Chapter 6 Questions Depreciation
  • natashad25 on MA Chapter 3 Questions Presenting Information

Copyright © 2025 · Support · Contact · Advertising · OpenLicense · About · Sitemap · Comments · Log in