Essential ACCA links
Advanced Taxation (CYP) – syllabus and study guide 2014
Advanced Taxation (HKG) – syllabus and study guide 2014
Advanced Taxation (IRL) – syllabus and study guide 2014
Advanced Taxation (MLA) – syllabus and study guide 2014
Advanced Taxation (MYS) – syllabus and study guide D14-J15
Advanced Taxation (SGP) – syllabus and study guide 2014
Advanced Taxation (UK) – syllabus and study guide 2014
Advanced Taxation (ZAF) – syllabus and study guide 2014
Paper P6 Changes for the December 2014 exams
P6 Syllabus changes:
There have been no changes to the syllabus.
P6 Format changes:
There is no change to the format of the exam. It will remain a three-hour paper, with 15 minutes reading time.
There will be two sections to the exam:
Section A contains two compulsory questions – question 1 is 35 marks, and question 2 has 25 marks.
Section B will be a choice of two from three 2o mark questions.
ACCA P6 Exam Tips – December 2014
Questions 1 and 2 on the paper will be based around real life practical
Question 1 will be for 35 marks and contain 4 professional marks awarded for
structuring the answer in the proper format and dealing professionally with the
issues raised. In either of these first 2 questions (question 2 will carry 25
marks), we are also likely to find 5 marks dealing with ethical issues such as
confidentiality, conflict of interest or non disclosure. Professional issues, such as information required from a new client are also well tested areas.
Here are 9 marks therefore that are little to do with technical competence in
taxation in which candidates at this level should and must score highly!
A rightly well examined area of the examining team deals with groups of companies, often where losses, both trading and maybe non trading loan relationship losses as well as capital have been experienced along with other chargeable gains arising and these need to be managed efficiently. This may involve group relief and consortium relief and the use of the matching election or group rollover relief within a gains group.
In preparing the Corporation Tax computation the new areas of applying the R&D tax credit for large companies and the lower rate of tax applicable to profits within the patent box are issues that could be tested or be discussion issues on the tax incentives for companies to invest in innovation and new products. This may also look in more detail at the purchase and disposal of other intangibles acquired post 1 April 2002
A number of areas where the candidate is asked to advise on both actual and
planned transactions would also be involved. A major issue here is dealing with
changes in group structures such as a proposed disposal of a subsidiary business
where either the parent company may sell the shares in the subsidiary company or
the subsidiary disposes of its assets and trade.
The decision will be based on which exit route achieves the highest net cash
receipt on sale.
The sale of the shares would test knowledge of the substantial shareholding
exemption and degrouping charges, while the sale of assets and trade would
involve computing chargeable gains or trading profits/losses arising on the sale of
each asset and calculating either the Corporation Tax payable for the final trading period or possibly the tax repayable as a result of a terminal loss relief claim.
The question may also/instead have an international aspect to it with advice being
required on whether to set up an overseas business as a subsidiary or branch.
If investing in a country with a lower tax rate than in the UK then the application of the new CFC legislation may be relevant along with whether to make the exemption election in respect of overseas branches.
Important points in the owner managed business life cycle lend themselves well
to practical real life scenarios involving multiple taxes. Advice on a start up
of a new business would involve the choice between unincorporated and incorporated along with the use of losses and the new rule of capping loss reliefs set against total income of earlier years, where employment income issues may be tested and termination payments on cessation of that employment. This would also test VAT registration and pre-registration input VAT along with NIC’s.
A tax efficient exit strategy for the owner manager is also where the client would need well structured professional advice. Should the client sell shares in their company accepting, as well as cash, shares and loan stock from the buyer, maybe a plc and possibly then lose their right to entrepreneurs’ relief in the future, or should the company sell its assets and trade and then distribute the net cash to the owner as either a capital or income distribution.
Disincorporation is not an area that has been previously tested but the new disincorporation relief may attract the examiners eye.
Another favoured area of the examining team has been the overseas aspects of
personal tax where we may have to advise on the implications for all the personal taxes of say a UK resident accepting a contract of employment overseas and determining whether their overseas income would be chargeable to UK tax and
if so, the application of DTR. The new statutory tests of residence would be examined here along with the rules on splitting the tax year between periods of residence and non residence.
With many candidates now coming through to P6 having passed F6 with IHT in that
syllabus we may see a move away from standard computational exercises on the
death of the taxpayer. Advice may be needed on when planned gifts should be
made, in lifetime or on death and therefore in relation to lifetime gifts the
taxpayer’s CGT position will need to be considered. This brings into consideration the CGT and IHT reliefs which are consistently examined as students consistently get them wrong! Candidates must know the conditions for reliefs to apply and must
not confuse CGT and IHT reliefs – note particularly gift relief and entrepreneurs’ relief in CGT and BPR in IHT.
If a death estate is required it is likely that there would be significant
bequests to charity bringing in the new 36% reduced rate. Planning after death
may then involve the use of a deed of variation by the beneficiaries to increase
the charitable legacy to meet the 10% required level, as the resultant saving of
IHT on the death estate is greater than the increased gift to charity.
In terms of advising on tax efficient investments then, though high risk, the
savings under the EIS or the new Seed EIS are high and may be tested.
Candidates must ensure that they have worked through all the technical articles written by the exam team relevant to FA 2013 and thought about how the technical issues may be applied in real life practical scenarios.
Unfortunately, we do not provide support for ACCA P6 Paper
ACCA P6 June 2013 study materials will not be available